It's actually slightly more complicated than this as you must be able to
specify *per IP* which MAC should be used, not simply per interface. That
was the barrier which stopped my VRRP implementation as well.
> On Sun, 30 Jan 2000, Joe Abley wrote:
>
> > On Sat, Jan 29, 2000 at 01:19:53AM +
On Sun, 30 Jan 2000, Joe Abley wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 29, 2000 at 01:19:53AM +, Tony Finch wrote:
> > I'd be interested to know of a free implementation of VRRP for the BSD
> > network stack.
>
> I started to look at this a while back, but started to flounder when
> I looked for an existing in
On Sat, Jan 29, 2000 at 01:19:53AM +, Tony Finch wrote:
> I'd be interested to know of a free implementation of VRRP for the BSD
> network stack.
I started to look at this a while back, but started to flounder when
I looked for an existing interface to allow me to source frames on
a local eth
Alfred Perlstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>Once you tell an application to bind to a particular IP address
>I'm pretty sure most don't have an option to bind another listen
>socket.
>
>The customer can't fail over properly because even when the alias
>for the box that dies comes up, thier daem
* Jack Rusher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [000128 15:04] wrote:
> Alfred Perlstein wrote:
> >
> > You have multiple customers on two boxes, each customer gets 2
> > IP address and you lolad balance between the two.
>
> Ah! I see your difficulty. I was thinking about availability; you
> were thinking a
Alfred Perlstein wrote:
>
> You have multiple customers on two boxes, each customer gets 2
> IP address and you lolad balance between the two.
Ah! I see your difficulty. I was thinking about availability; you
were thinking about load balancing.
> Some customers may wish to run thier own sql s
* Jack Rusher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [000128 07:42] wrote:
> Alfred Perlstein wrote:
> >
> > Does anyone particularly like/hate this idea? Just wanted to
> > share, and possibly get better suggestions.
>
> I usually do that like this:
>
> HostA -> Address1, Alias1
> HostB -> Address2
>
> ...wher
Alfred Perlstein wrote:
>
> Does anyone particularly like/hate this idea? Just wanted to
> share, and possibly get better suggestions.
I usually do that like this:
HostA -> Address1, Alias1
HostB -> Address2
...where Host A and Host B talk to each other through the pair of
"real" addresses, w
This is an idea I had to help people provide for reduntant servers.
Many programs will bind to all interfaces to serve requests, however
sometimes it's important that a service only appear on a single IP
or interface. However you'd really like the server to be able to
bind to 2 IP addresses, one
9 matches
Mail list logo
