Re: fdescfs functional in 6.1?

2006-07-29 Thread Rick C. Petty
On Fri, Jul 28, 2006 at 11:16:53PM -0700, Jaye Mathisen wrote: > I guess I just expected it to print all character device entries for the > file descriptors open by my process. It did-- well it printed all the file descriptors open by your process, which in this case was "ls". 0, 1, and 2 are std

Re: fdescfs functional in 6.1?

2006-07-29 Thread Dan Nelson
In the last episode (Jul 28), Jaye Mathisen said: > On Fri, Jul 28, 2006 at 11:18:48PM -0500, Dan Nelson wrote: > > In the last episode (Jul 28), Jaye Mathisen said: > > > s2# mount -t fdescfs fdescfs /dev/fd > > > s2# ls -l /dev/fd > > > total 16 > > > crw--w 1 root tty 5, 1 Ju

Re: fdescfs functional in 6.1?

2006-07-28 Thread Jaye Mathisen
I guess I just expected it to print all character device entries for the file descriptors open by my process. Kind of like the old /dev/fd/1 /dev/fd/2 directories used to be under MAKEDEV... On Fri, Jul 28, 2006 at 11:18:48PM -0500, Dan Nelson wrote: > In the last episode (Jul 28), Jaye Mathisen

Re: fdescfs functional in 6.1?

2006-07-28 Thread Dan Nelson
In the last episode (Jul 28), Jaye Mathisen said: > devfs is mounted, fdesc is unmounted: > > s2# ls -l /dev/fd > total 0 > crw-rw-rw- 1 root wheel 250, 0 Jul 25 03:25 0 > crw-rw-rw- 1 root wheel 250, 1 Jul 25 03:28 1 > crw-rw-rw- 1 root wheel 250, 2 Jul 25 03:27 2 > > Looks just l

fdescfs functional in 6.1?

2006-07-28 Thread Jaye Mathisen
I will confess, I have on idea if this is what's supposed to be happening. The OpenBSD spam filter system need access to /dev/fd/7. Man page says that I need to mount the fdescfs to get access. Fine. I'm running 6.1-STABLE. So here's what I see, and it looks very odd: devfs is mounted, fde