On 2011-12-10 02:21, Gleb Kurtsou wrote:
Please find test case and test results attached. (gcc-test1.shar.txt)
The long story short: only gcc-4.2 is affected, gcc 3.4, 4.4 and 4.6 are
ok. clang is ok. (test-cc.txt)
Nearly all of the workarounds I used in original test doesn't work in
this
On 2011-12-08, at 17:53, Nathan Whitehorn wrote:
On 12/08/11 03:01, Piotr Nowak wrote:
We're working on PowerPC target using GCC 4.2.1
and FreeBSD 6.1. It seems like we have similar
problem. In our case GCC sometimes very unfortunately
optimize code with -fno-omit-frame-pointer.
Example
Hi,
On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 10:15 AM, Rafal Jaworowski r...@semihalf.com wrote:
On 2011-12-08, at 17:53, Nathan Whitehorn wrote:
On 12/08/11 03:01, Piotr Nowak wrote:
We're working on PowerPC target using GCC 4.2.1
and FreeBSD 6.1. It seems like we have similar
problem. In our case GCC
On (09/12/2011 16:15), Rafal Jaworowski wrote:
On 2011-12-08, at 17:53, Nathan Whitehorn wrote:
On 12/08/11 03:01, Piotr Nowak wrote:
We're working on PowerPC target using GCC 4.2.1
and FreeBSD 6.1. It seems like we have similar
problem. In our case GCC sometimes very unfortunately
On 9 Dec 2011 17:51, Arnaud Lacombe lacom...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 10:15 AM, Rafal Jaworowski r...@semihalf.com
wrote:
On 2011-12-08, at 17:53, Nathan Whitehorn wrote:
On 12/08/11 03:01, Piotr Nowak wrote:
We're working on PowerPC target using GCC 4.2.1
and
On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 1:15 PM, Gleb Kurtsou gleb.kurt...@gmail.com wrote:
-fno-omit-frame-pointer is there for kernel debugger to be able to
generate backtraces.
It's also needed by the DTrace stack() action, hwpmc callchain capture
and stack(9). Disabling it as anything other than a very
Please find test case and test results attached. (gcc-test1.shar.txt)
The long story short: only gcc-4.2 is affected, gcc 3.4, 4.4 and 4.6 are
ok. clang is ok. (test-cc.txt)
Nearly all of the workarounds I used in original test doesn't work in
this test case (see #ifdef BAD_FIX in sources).
gcc
On 2011-12-07, at 21:28, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
Hi,
On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 5:01 AM, Gleb Kurtsou gleb.kurt...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I was lucky to write a bit of code which gcc 4.2 fails to compile
correctly with -O2. Too keep long story short the code fails for gcc
from base system and
On (08/12/2011 10:01), Piotr Nowak wrote:
We're working on PowerPC target using GCC 4.2.1
and FreeBSD 6.1. It seems like we have similar
problem. In our case GCC sometimes very unfortunately
optimize code with -fno-omit-frame-pointer.
Example shown below covers file sys/powerc/booke/pmap.c
We're working on PowerPC target using GCC 4.2.1
and FreeBSD 6.1. It seems like we have similar
problem. In our case GCC sometimes very unfortunately
optimize code with -fno-omit-frame-pointer.
Example shown below covers file sys/powerc/booke/pmap.c
and function pmap_kenter. If we disassemble
On 12/08/11 03:01, Piotr Nowak wrote:
We're working on PowerPC target using GCC 4.2.1
and FreeBSD 6.1. It seems like we have similar
problem. In our case GCC sometimes very unfortunately
optimize code with -fno-omit-frame-pointer.
Example shown below covers file sys/powerc/booke/pmap.c
and
On Sat, 19 Nov 2011 12:01:50 +0200
Gleb Kurtsou gleb.kurt...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I was lucky to write a bit of code which gcc 4.2 fails to compile
correctly with -O2. Too keep long story short the code fails for gcc
from base system and last gcc 4.2 snapshot from ports. It works with
gcc
Hi,
On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 5:01 AM, Gleb Kurtsou gleb.kurt...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I was lucky to write a bit of code which gcc 4.2 fails to compile
correctly with -O2. Too keep long story short the code fails for gcc
from base system and last gcc 4.2 snapshot from ports. It works with gcc
On Sat, 19 Nov 2011 12:01:50 +0200
Gleb Kurtsou gleb.kurt...@gmail.com mentioned:
Hi,
I was lucky to write a bit of code which gcc 4.2 fails to compile
correctly with -O2. Too keep long story short the code fails for gcc
from base system and last gcc 4.2 snapshot from ports. It works with
On (02/12/2011 01:56), Stanislav Sedov wrote:
On Sat, 19 Nov 2011 12:01:50 +0200
Gleb Kurtsou gleb.kurt...@gmail.com mentioned:
Hi,
I was lucky to write a bit of code which gcc 4.2 fails to compile
correctly with -O2. Too keep long story short the code fails for gcc
from base system
On (19/11/2011 09:11), m...@freebsd.org wrote:
On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 8:19 AM, Gleb Kurtsou gleb.kurt...@gmail.com wrote:
On (19/11/2011 07:26), m...@freebsd.org wrote:
On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 2:01 AM, Gleb Kurtsou gleb.kurt...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
I was lucky to write a bit of
On (20/11/2011 01:57), Alexander Best wrote:
On Sat Nov 19 11, Gleb Kurtsou wrote:
On (19/11/2011 12:25), Alexander Best wrote:
On Sat Nov 19 11, Gleb Kurtsou wrote:
Hi,
I was lucky to write a bit of code which gcc 4.2 fails to compile
correctly with -O2. Too keep long story
On Sun Nov 20 11, Gleb Kurtsou wrote:
On (20/11/2011 01:57), Alexander Best wrote:
On Sat Nov 19 11, Gleb Kurtsou wrote:
On (19/11/2011 12:25), Alexander Best wrote:
On Sat Nov 19 11, Gleb Kurtsou wrote:
Hi,
I was lucky to write a bit of code which gcc 4.2 fails to
On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 10:24 AM, Gleb Kurtsou gleb.kurt...@gmail.com wrote:
On (19/11/2011 09:11), m...@freebsd.org wrote:
On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 8:19 AM, Gleb Kurtsou gleb.kurt...@gmail.com wrote:
On (19/11/2011 07:26), m...@freebsd.org wrote:
On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 2:01 AM, Gleb Kurtsou
Hi,
I was lucky to write a bit of code which gcc 4.2 fails to compile
correctly with -O2. Too keep long story short the code fails for gcc
from base system and last gcc 4.2 snapshot from ports. It works with gcc
4.3, gcc 4.4 on FreeBSD and Linux. Clang from base is also good. -O and
-Os
On Sat Nov 19 11, Gleb Kurtsou wrote:
Hi,
I was lucky to write a bit of code which gcc 4.2 fails to compile
correctly with -O2. Too keep long story short the code fails for gcc
from base system and last gcc 4.2 snapshot from ports. It works with gcc
4.3, gcc 4.4 on FreeBSD and Linux. Clang
On (19/11/2011 12:25), Alexander Best wrote:
On Sat Nov 19 11, Gleb Kurtsou wrote:
Hi,
I was lucky to write a bit of code which gcc 4.2 fails to compile
correctly with -O2. Too keep long story short the code fails for gcc
from base system and last gcc 4.2 snapshot from ports. It works
On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 2:01 AM, Gleb Kurtsou gleb.kurt...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I was lucky to write a bit of code which gcc 4.2 fails to compile
correctly with -O2. Too keep long story short the code fails for gcc
from base system and last gcc 4.2 snapshot from ports. It works with gcc
4.3,
On (19/11/2011 07:26), m...@freebsd.org wrote:
On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 2:01 AM, Gleb Kurtsou gleb.kurt...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I was lucky to write a bit of code which gcc 4.2 fails to compile
correctly with -O2. Too keep long story short the code fails for gcc
from base system and last
On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 8:19 AM, Gleb Kurtsou gleb.kurt...@gmail.com wrote:
On (19/11/2011 07:26), m...@freebsd.org wrote:
On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 2:01 AM, Gleb Kurtsou gleb.kurt...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I was lucky to write a bit of code which gcc 4.2 fails to compile
correctly with -O2.
On Sat Nov 19 11, Gleb Kurtsou wrote:
On (19/11/2011 12:25), Alexander Best wrote:
On Sat Nov 19 11, Gleb Kurtsou wrote:
Hi,
I was lucky to write a bit of code which gcc 4.2 fails to compile
correctly with -O2. Too keep long story short the code fails for gcc
from base system
26 matches
Mail list logo
