Re: gcc object format -> need motorola s-records.

2003-10-09 Thread chuckr
Daniel Eischen wrote: On Wed, 8 Oct 2003, Eric Jacobs wrote: On Wed, 8 Oct 2003 22:52:10 +0100 Josef Karthauser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Does anyone know how to control the type of output files that gcc creates? I need to generate motorola S-records instead of ELF files, but I can't fi

Re: gcc object format -> need motorola s-records.

2003-10-08 Thread Daniel Eischen
On Wed, 8 Oct 2003, Eric Jacobs wrote: > On Wed, 8 Oct 2003 22:52:10 +0100 > Josef Karthauser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Does anyone know how to control the type of output files that gcc > > creates? I need to generate motorola S-records instead of ELF files, > > but I can't find a switch

Re: gcc object format -> need motorola s-records.

2003-10-08 Thread Eric Jacobs
On Wed, 8 Oct 2003 22:52:10 +0100 Josef Karthauser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Does anyone know how to control the type of output files that gcc > creates? I need to generate motorola S-records instead of ELF files, > but I can't find a switch to make this happen. Do I need to build a new > com

Re: gcc object format -> need motorola s-records.

2003-10-08 Thread chuckr
Josef Karthauser wrote: Does anyone know how to control the type of output files that gcc creates? I need to generate motorola S-records instead of ELF files, but I can't find a switch to make this happen. Do I need to build a new compiler by hand, and if so, does anyone know what the backend ob

gcc object format -> need motorola s-records.

2003-10-08 Thread Josef Karthauser
Does anyone know how to control the type of output files that gcc creates? I need to generate motorola S-records instead of ELF files, but I can't find a switch to make this happen. Do I need to build a new compiler by hand, and if so, does anyone know what the backend object format is called? T