Re: general Darwin imports (was Re: Darwin cmd import?)

2004-06-07 Thread Matthew George
On Sat, 5 Jun 2004, David Scheidt wrote: > > Just about all of that is listed as covered by the APSL. (Except GPL'd > stuff, it looks like.) > > I noticed this as well, but if you look at the contents (of libc in this case), there are several */FreeBSD/ directories that contain files that retain

Re: general Darwin imports (was Re: Darwin cmd import?)

2004-06-05 Thread David Scheidt
On Jun 5, 2004, at 2:55 PM, Robert Watson wrote: On Sat, 5 Jun 2004, Edwin Groothuis wrote: Now the question of course is: where can I find it? It is somewhere in a CVS repository (that would be nicest), or are it raw sourcefiles only? Edwin, now owning a Mac so not really familiar with things Th

Re: general Darwin imports (was Re: Darwin cmd import?)

2004-06-05 Thread Robert Watson
On Sat, 5 Jun 2004, Edwin Groothuis wrote: > Now the question of course is: where can I find it? It is somewhere in a > CVS repository (that would be nicest), or are it raw sourcefiles only? > > Edwin, now owning a Mac so not really familiar with things The Open Darwin web site has a web-based

Re: general Darwin imports (was Re: Darwin cmd import?)

2004-06-05 Thread Michael W. Lucas
On Sat, Jun 05, 2004 at 09:59:15PM +1000, Edwin Groothuis wrote: > On Wed, Jun 02, 2004 at 09:57:57AM -0400, Michael W. Lucas wrote: > > People may gripe about Apple not returning stuff to the open source > > community. The truth is, they have. They aren't responsible for > > converting what they

Re: general Darwin imports (was Re: Darwin cmd import?)

2004-06-05 Thread Edwin Groothuis
On Wed, Jun 02, 2004 at 09:57:57AM -0400, Michael W. Lucas wrote: > People may gripe about Apple not returning stuff to the open source > community. The truth is, they have. They aren't responsible for > converting what they return into a format we can use, but they haven't > deliberately obfusca

Re: general Darwin imports (was Re: Darwin cmd import?)

2004-06-02 Thread Robert Watson
On Wed, 2 Jun 2004, Michael W. Lucas wrote: > On Sat, May 29, 2004 at 07:55:21PM -0400, Robert Watson wrote: > > The FreeBSD Core Team took a look at the APSL a while back, and decided > > that similar to LGPL/GPL, it was an acceptable license for use in > > userspace for stand-alone tools, but th

general Darwin imports (was Re: Darwin cmd import?)

2004-06-02 Thread Michael W. Lucas
On Sat, May 29, 2004 at 07:55:21PM -0400, Robert Watson wrote: > The FreeBSD Core Team took a look at the APSL a while back, and decided > that similar to LGPL/GPL, it was an acceptable license for use in > userspace for stand-alone tools, but that similar protections to LGPL/GPL > would be require