Re: gethostbyname_r

2003-07-02 Thread Simon L. Nielsen
l. General consensus seems to be that implementing > > it properly is Hard. > > Yes, it is, or at least was in 4.x. I thought we got a shiny new > gethostbyname_r with Jacques Vidrine's nss implementation in 5.0, > though. Is this not right? Not yet. Jacques Vid

Re: gethostbyname_r

2003-07-02 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Wed, Jul 02, 2003 at 02:45:49PM -0700, Wes Peters wrote: > On Monday 30 June 2003 14:39, Kris Kennaway wrote: > > On Mon, Jun 30, 2003 at 04:43:27PM +0200, Stijn Hoop wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > I was wondering if anybody was working on an implementation

Re: gethostbyname_r

2003-07-02 Thread Wes Peters
On Monday 30 June 2003 14:39, Kris Kennaway wrote: > On Mon, Jun 30, 2003 at 04:43:27PM +0200, Stijn Hoop wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I was wondering if anybody was working on an implementation of a > > reentrant gethostbyname_r function, mostly because it looks like > &

Re: gethostbyname_r

2003-07-01 Thread Sean Farley
On Mon, 30 Jun 2003, Stijn Hoop wrote: > Hi, > > I was wondering if anybody was working on an implementation of a > reentrant gethostbyname_r function, mostly because it looks like > mozilla/firebird will finally gain support for an async DNS thread in > the near future. However

Re: gethostbyname_r

2003-06-30 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Mon, Jun 30, 2003 at 04:43:27PM +0200, Stijn Hoop wrote: > Hi, > > I was wondering if anybody was working on an implementation of a reentrant > gethostbyname_r function, mostly because it looks like mozilla/firebird will > finally gain support for an async DNS thread in

Re: gethostbyname_r

2003-06-30 Thread Hajimu UMEMOTO
Hi, >>>>> On Mon, 30 Jun 2003 16:43:27 +0200 >>>>> Stijn Hoop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: stijn> I was wondering if anybody was working on an implementation of a reentrant stijn> gethostbyname_r function, mostly because it looks like mozilla/firebird wil

Re: gethostbyname_r

2003-06-30 Thread Simon L. Nielsen
On 2003.06.30 16:43:27 +0200, Stijn Hoop wrote: > I was wondering if anybody was working on an implementation of a reentrant > gethostbyname_r function, mostly because it looks like mozilla/firebird will This was discussed on the -threads mailinglist a few weeks ago. Try looking at the ac

gethostbyname_r

2003-06-30 Thread Stijn Hoop
Hi, I was wondering if anybody was working on an implementation of a reentrant gethostbyname_r function, mostly because it looks like mozilla/firebird will finally gain support for an async DNS thread in the near future. However, it is claimed in Mozilla's bug reporting system that FreeBS

Re: gethostbyname_r() fbsd equiv?

2002-09-29 Thread Ian Lister
On Fri, 27 Sep 2002, Hiten Pandya wrote: >Doesnt getaddrinfo() do whatever gethostbyname() can do? And also, if >my source of information is correct, getaddrinfo() should be thread-safe >and also, it is under the POSIX p1003.1g. Generally speaking, yes. Actually, POSIX 1003.1g doesn't require th

Re: gethostbyname_r() fbsd equiv?

2002-09-27 Thread Hiten Pandya
On Fri, Sep 13, 2002 at 09:01:45AM -0700, Terry Lambert wrote the words in effect of: > Terry Lambert wrote: > > Jev wrote: > > > Im trying to build some software on freebsd, which wants to use > > > the thread safe gethostbyname_r(). Despite having very bad C skills i

gethostbyname_r

2001-06-17 Thread Gabor Kincses
What's the status of the _r routines (esp. gethostbyname_r) in -STABLE? -- Gabor Kincses Running FreeBSD 4.3-RC3 To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message