[ This isn't really a -isp issue, is it? ]
On Wed, Jun 21, 2000 at 09:40:37PM +0200, a little birdie told me
that Blaz Zupan remarked
> On Wed, 21 Jun 2000, Dennis wrote:
> > What is the distiction/benefit of using the if_dc driver rather than the
> > if_de driver with the d-link quad card? They
> At 03:22 PM 6/21/00 -0500, Joe Greco wrote:
> >Either seems to work, but the if_de driver does not properly support full
> >duplex.
>
> is that for all cards, or just some?
For the specific card you mentioned. I still use the SMC 9334BDT's (dual
Tulip 21143) here and they work great at full-d
At 03:22 PM 6/21/00 -0500, Joe Greco wrote:
>Either seems to work, but the if_de driver does not properly support full
>duplex.
is that for all cards, or just some?
The cards Im using seem to detect correctly for all the hubs, switches and
crossovers to cards that I've tried with the de driver.
Either seems to work, but the if_de driver does not properly support full
duplex.
--
... Joe
---
Joe Greco - Systems Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Solaria Public Access UNIX - Milwaukee, WI
On Wed, 21 Jun 2000, Dennis wrote:
> What is the distiction/benefit of using the if_dc driver rather than the
> if_de driver with the d-link quad card? They seem to work with both.
I'd say, use the if_dc driver, if it works for you. My guess is it will be
better maintained (because it actually HA
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Dennis writes:
>
>I asked this on the hackers list and noone answered, so maybe some of the
>isps know?
Why don't you spend some time testing it and tell us the result ?
--
Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | TCP/IP sin
I asked this on the hackers list and noone answered, so maybe some of the
isps know?
What is the distiction/benefit of using the if_dc driver rather than the
if_de driver with the d-link quad card? They seem to work with both.
Dennis
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubs
7 matches
Mail list logo
