Someone really needs to remove this guy from the list (or at least give
him an "official" warning of some kind). His repeated warnings on the
list has not done anything to his conduct nor has it caused him to stop
his childish antics. All he is doing is polluting the list archives.
In the 4 yea
Why must you continue to respond to threads that you have no answer for,
wasting our bandwidth, disk space, and time to read your useless messages?
--Peter
c0ldbyte wrote:
On Thu, 21 Apr 2005, Omar Lopez Limonta wrote:
I Change:
net.inet.ip.fw.dyn_ack_lifetime: 300 -> 3600
net.inet.ip.fw.dyn_udp_
On Thu, 21 Apr 2005, Omar Lopez Limonta wrote:
I Change:
net.inet.ip.fw.dyn_ack_lifetime: 300 -> 3600
net.inet.ip.fw.dyn_udp_lifetime: 10 -> 10
net.inet.ip.fw.dyn_buckets: 256 -> 1024
net.inet.ip.fw.dyn_max: 1000 -> 2500
¿Are good these values? , ¿i need chanege another value?
Dont know my friend.
I Change:
net.inet.ip.fw.dyn_ack_lifetime: 300 -> 3600
net.inet.ip.fw.dyn_udp_lifetime: 10 -> 10
net.inet.ip.fw.dyn_buckets: 256 -> 1024
net.inet.ip.fw.dyn_max: 1000 -> 2500
¿Are good these values? , ¿i need chanege another value?
2005/4/21, c0ldbyte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Thu, 21 Apr
On Thu, 21 Apr 2005, Omar Lopez Limonta wrote:
Hi:
Anyone know what are the sysctl option to give more lifetime to net packets?
Or another anything to elongate the net packets lifetime without use ipfw2?
Thanks.
sysctl -a |grep ttl
will grep for any matching (Time To Live) settings.
if thats what y
Hi:
Anyone know what are the sysctl option to give more lifetime to net packets?
Or another anything to elongate the net packets lifetime without use ipfw2?
Thanks.
--
http://pollo-es-pollo.blogspot.com
Te lo traigo fresco.
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd
6 matches
Mail list logo
