> There is a difference between a log-structured filesystem and a
> journaling filesystem...
And?
> *Very* different from LFS. (What are features? "Has files and
> directories"? Time-complexity? Implementation details? Buzzwords?)
You know. Features. As in those things that people would like
Don <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Softupdates is definitely a viable solution however it does not
> address several issues and the license is not a BSD license so it
> makes me uncomfortable.
Well, Kirk's idea is to put them under a BSD-style license as soon as
possible, so in the long run, you m
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Don) writes:
> > and the next question: now that LFS starts to get usable in NetBSD
> > - has anybody started to look at getting it working again in
> > FreeBSD too (maybe matt ?) or has it on the TODO list
> LFS is being considered as a starting point for this project. The g
> is anybody working on adding journaling to the (Free)BSD ufs - or
> are there any docs in that direction avalibale - any papers or
> so ? how much harder this is getting due to the complex
> FreeBSD vm/buffercache and soft updates ? - is
> anybody intereseted in starting to work on
> this ?
Thi
is anybody working on adding journaling to the (Free)BSD ufs - or
are there any docs in that direction avalibale - any papers or
so ? how much harder this is getting due to the complex
FreeBSD vm/buffercache and soft updates ? - is
anybody intereseted in starting to work on
this ?
and the next q
5 matches
Mail list logo
