On 24 Apr 2010, at 20:42, Pegasus Mc Cleaft wrote:
Hello Hackers & Current,
I was wondering it if is possible, or if it can be done so a
separate set
of CC, CXX, etc can be specified for building the world and kernel
independently of a ports build?
Right now, I use the base GCC to co
On Sunday 25 April 2010 11:17:40 Ulrich Spörlein wrote:
> On Sat, 24.04.2010 at 16:42:37 +, Pegasus Mc Cleaft wrote:
> > It may already be implemented, but it would be nice if there was
> > something defined while the kernel and/or world is being built to that a
> > nested block of ifdefs c
On Sat, 24.04.2010 at 16:42:37 +, Pegasus Mc Cleaft wrote:
> Hello Hackers & Current,
>
> I was wondering it if is possible, or if it can be done so a separate
> set
> of CC, CXX, etc can be specified for building the world and kernel
> independently of a ports build?
>
> Righ
On 04/24/10 09:42, Pegasus Mc Cleaft wrote:
> Hello Hackers & Current,
Please don't crosspost. If you're not what list to post to, the
algorithm is: If the question is about a port, or the ports in general,
use freebsd-ports@, otherwise use freebsd-questi...@. This post should
have gone to -ports
On Sat, Apr 24, 2010 at 5:42 PM, Pegasus Mc Cleaft wrote:
> Hello Hackers & Current,
>
> I was wondering it if is possible, or if it can be done so a separate
> set
> of CC, CXX, etc can be specified for building the world and kernel
> independently of a ports build?
>
> Right now,
Hello Hackers & Current,
I was wondering it if is possible, or if it can be done so a separate
set
of CC, CXX, etc can be specified for building the world and kernel
independently of a ports build?
Right now, I use the base GCC to compile the world and kernel, and
GCC44
for
6 matches
Mail list logo
