Re: kernel + mfsroot article review

2002-10-22 Thread Marc Olzheim
On Fri, Oct 18, 2002 at 04:42:01PM -0700, David Yeske wrote: MD_ROOT_SIZE is only needed for write_mfs_in_kernel. When write_mfs_in_kernel was removed the code that used it was not though. I don't think it is still being used though. A couple of files still reference it:

kernel + mfsroot article review

2002-10-18 Thread David Yeske
I am writing an article about a replacement for write_mfs_in_kernel, and I wanted to get some feedback on the article and the patch... http://pigseye.kennesaw.edu/~dyeske/freebsd/article.html It would be very helpful if people could download the kernel and boot it and give me feedback. I

Re: kernel + mfsroot article review

2002-10-18 Thread Luigi Rizzo
from your patch i am a bit unclear, do you still depend on having MD_ROOT_SIZE or you can get rid of it ? cheers luigi On Fri, Oct 18, 2002 at 03:56:11PM -0700, David Yeske wrote: I am writing an article about a replacement for write_mfs_in_kernel, and I wanted to get some

Re: kernel + mfsroot article review

2002-10-18 Thread Luigi Rizzo
On Fri, Oct 18, 2002 at 04:42:01PM -0700, David Yeske wrote: MD_ROOT_SIZE is only needed for write_mfs_in_kernel. When write_mfs_in_kernel was removed the ok, sorry for the confusion, i misread the patch. luigi To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe

Re: kernel + mfsroot article review

2002-10-18 Thread David Yeske
MD_ROOT_SIZE is only needed for write_mfs_in_kernel. When write_mfs_in_kernel was removed the code that used it was not though. I don't think it is still being used though. A couple of files still reference it: src/sys/dev/md/md.c has ifdefs for it, src/release/Makefile still compiles it on