Re: md(8) panic

2004-05-13 Thread Pawel Jakub Dawidek
On Thu, May 13, 2004 at 03:58:02PM +0300, Alex Lyashkov wrote: +> > This sector size is valid and shouldn't be rejected. +> > This patch works for me: +> > +> >http://people.freebsd.org/~pjd/patches/md.c.3.patch +> in patch +> +sc->nsect = (mdio->md_size * DEV_BSIZE) / sc->secsize; +> why

Re: md(8) panic

2004-05-13 Thread Alex Lyashkov
В Чтв, 13.05.2004, в 15:29, Pawel Jakub Dawidek пишет: > On Wed, May 12, 2004 at 02:08:05PM +0100, Mike Bristow wrote: > +> Hi, > +> > +> I am trying to access some ancient 5 1/4" floppies, with 256 byte > +> sectors. Leaving aside the interesting hardware problems, the > +> filesystem on these d

Re: md(8) panic

2004-05-13 Thread Pawel Jakub Dawidek
On Wed, May 12, 2004 at 02:08:05PM +0100, Mike Bristow wrote: +> Hi, +> +> I am trying to access some ancient 5 1/4" floppies, with 256 byte +> sectors. Leaving aside the interesting hardware problems, the +> filesystem on these disks is (surprisingly enough) not supported on +> -CURRENT. While

md(8) panic

2004-05-12 Thread Mike Bristow
Hi, I am trying to access some ancient 5 1/4" floppies, with 256 byte sectors. Leaving aside the interesting hardware problems, the filesystem on these disks is (surprisingly enough) not supported on -CURRENT. While attempting to write one, I ran: # mdconfig -a -t malloc -S 256 -s 20 Thinking