On 3/1/13 5:50 AM, Andriy Gapon wrote:
I am trying to understand if it is possible to allow memory allocations
(M_NOWAIT,
of course) in a spinlock context.
I do not see any obvious architectural obstacles.
But the fact that all of the uma locks, system map lock, object locks, page
queue
locks a
on 01/03/2013 16:22 Matthew Jacob said the following:
> On 3/1/2013 5:50 AM, Andriy Gapon wrote:
>> I am trying to understand if it is possible to allow memory allocations
>> (M_NOWAIT,
>> of course) in a spinlock context.
>>
> There are mechanisms to do just this- essentially by creating private
On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 2:50 PM, Andriy Gapon wrote:
>
> I am trying to understand if it is possible to allow memory allocations
> (M_NOWAIT,
> of course) in a spinlock context.
> I do not see any obvious architectural obstacles.
> But the fact that all of the uma locks, system map lock, object lo
On 3/1/2013 5:50 AM, Andriy Gapon wrote:
I am trying to understand if it is possible to allow memory allocations
(M_NOWAIT,
of course) in a spinlock context.
There are mechanisms to do just this- essentially by creating private
pools that are organized in a way to allow for spinlock (and thus
I am trying to understand if it is possible to allow memory allocations
(M_NOWAIT,
of course) in a spinlock context.
I do not see any obvious architectural obstacles.
But the fact that all of the uma locks, system map lock, object locks, page
queue
locks and so on are regular mutexes makes it im
5 matches
Mail list logo