Re: natd passes inconsistent addresses to ipfw?

2001-07-28 Thread Richard Seaman, Jr.
Whoops. Meant to cc this to the list too. -- Richard Seaman, Jr.email:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 5182 N. Maple Lane phone:262-367-5450 Nashotah WI 53058fax:262-367-5852 On Sat, Jul 28, 2001 at 12:19:01PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I'm worried about the

Re: natd passes inconsistent addresses to ipfw?

2001-07-28 Thread mikescott
On 27 Jul 2001, at 19:49, Daniel C. Sobral wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > With the following ipfw config fragment, > > Which happens not to include the rule that is denying your packets... Untrue -- it's the "deny log tcp from any to any established" in the fragment I gave (# 00600

Re: natd passes inconsistent addresses to ipfw?

2001-07-27 Thread Daniel C. Sobral
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > With the following ipfw config fragment, Which happens not to include the rule that is denying your packets... > > # divert packets through the tunnel interface > $fwcmd add divert natd all from any to any via tun0 > ... > # allow anything I start up (OK) > # allow

natd passes inconsistent addresses to ipfw?

2001-07-27 Thread mikescott
(I've tried this already on the "questions" list already, but without success. I hope it's not too trivial for this list -- either I'm missing something glaringly obvious (probable), or there's a bug. Either way, I'm stuck :-( ) It looks to me as though natd and ipfw interact inconsistently