Wayne Cuddy wrote:
>
> Ok, if you suggested the TCP_NODELAY option you were right. Once we set this
> FreeBSD sent 25 msgs/second, Linux did 22 msgs/second and HPSUX did 15
> msgs/second. (we TCP_NODELAY on all platforms)
>
> Is the Linux Nangle algo broken/different?
It can be turned off by de
Wayne Cuddy wrote:
>
> Ok, if you suggested the TCP_NODELAY option you were right. Once we set this
> FreeBSD sent 25 msgs/second, Linux did 22 msgs/second and HPSUX did 15
> msgs/second. (we TCP_NODELAY on all platforms)
>
> Is the Linux Nangle algo broken/different?
It can be turned off by d
, Wayne Cuddy wrote:
> Date: Tue, 24 Aug 1999 00:38:21 -0400 (EDT)
> From: Wayne Cuddy
> To: FreeBSD Hackers List
> Subject: network performance vs. linux on small transfers
>
> I am involved in a messaging system at work in which we need to send/receive
> large amounts of sma
, Wayne Cuddy wrote:
> Date: Tue, 24 Aug 1999 00:38:21 -0400 (EDT)
> From: Wayne Cuddy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: FreeBSD Hackers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: network performance vs. linux on small transfers
>
> I am involved in a messaging system at work in which w
According to kadal:
> you may also try other MTA such as qmail, postfix, etc.
Postfix (and qmail I think) support SMTP PIPELINING, which greatly reduce
latency. It is very interesting for small messages.
--
Ollivier ROBERT -=- FreeBSD: The Power to Serve! -=- robe...@keltia.freenix.fr
FreeBSD ke
On Tue, 24 Aug 1999, kadal wrote:
>
>
>
> On Tue, 24 Aug 1999, Wayne Cuddy wrote:
>
> > Date: Tue, 24 Aug 1999 00:38:21 -0400 (EDT)
> > From: Wayne Cuddy
> > To: FreeBSD Hackers List
> > Subject: network performance vs. linux on small transfers
> &g
According to kadal:
> you may also try other MTA such as qmail, postfix, etc.
Postfix (and qmail I think) support SMTP PIPELINING, which greatly reduce
latency. It is very interesting for small messages.
--
Ollivier ROBERT -=- FreeBSD: The Power to Serve! -=- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
FreeBSD keltia.fr
On Tue, 24 Aug 1999, Wayne Cuddy wrote:
> Date: Tue, 24 Aug 1999 00:38:21 -0400 (EDT)
> From: Wayne Cuddy
> To: FreeBSD Hackers List
> Subject: network performance vs. linux on small transfers
>
> I am involved in a messaging system at work in which we need to send/receive
On Tue, 24 Aug 1999, kadal wrote:
>
>
>
> On Tue, 24 Aug 1999, Wayne Cuddy wrote:
>
> > Date: Tue, 24 Aug 1999 00:38:21 -0400 (EDT)
> > From: Wayne Cuddy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: FreeBSD Hackers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Subjec
>I am involved in a messaging system at work in which we need to send/receive
>large amounts of small (one line messages) SMTP messages. We are currently
>using Sendmail 8.9.3
>on HPUX.
>
>Our application sends messages down a FIFO to a daemon process that is reading
>from
>the FIFO. This proce
Wayne Cuddy wrote:
>
> I am involved in a messaging system at work in which we need to send/receive
> large amounts of small (one line messages) SMTP messages. We are currently
> using Sendmail 8.9.3
> on HPUX.
>
> Our application sends messages down a FIFO to a daemon process that is
> readin
I am involved in a messaging system at work in which we need to send/receive
large amounts of small (one line messages) SMTP messages. We are currently
using Sendmail 8.9.3
on HPUX.
Our application sends messages down a FIFO to a daemon process that is reading
from
the FIFO. This process then
On Tue, 24 Aug 1999, Wayne Cuddy wrote:
> Date: Tue, 24 Aug 1999 00:38:21 -0400 (EDT)
> From: Wayne Cuddy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: FreeBSD Hackers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: network performance vs. linux on small transfers
>
> I am involved in a messag
>I am involved in a messaging system at work in which we need to send/receive
>large amounts of small (one line messages) SMTP messages. We are currently using
>Sendmail 8.9.3
>on HPUX.
>
>Our application sends messages down a FIFO to a daemon process that is reading from
>the FIFO. This proces
Wayne Cuddy wrote:
>
> I am involved in a messaging system at work in which we need to send/receive
> large amounts of small (one line messages) SMTP messages. We are currently using
>Sendmail 8.9.3
> on HPUX.
>
> Our application sends messages down a FIFO to a daemon process that is reading f
I am involved in a messaging system at work in which we need to send/receive
large amounts of small (one line messages) SMTP messages. We are currently using
Sendmail 8.9.3
on HPUX.
Our application sends messages down a FIFO to a daemon process that is reading from
the FIFO. This process then
16 matches
Mail list logo
