[Redirecting to the hackers list -- please respect the reply-to header]
> "Claus" == Claus Assmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Claus> On Mon, May 27, 2002, Philip J. Koenig wrote:
>> Any particular reason why the sendmail with 4.6-RC is writing sm-
>> client.pid into /var/spool/c
As this thread once more suggests, the whole concept of pidfiles is broken.
The proper way is to use a service control manager which keeps track of
processes, allowing them to be stopped/restarted etc. through a single API. (I
am not going to mention AIX's System Resource Controller again because
On 27 May 2002, at 12:24, Lyndon Nerenberg boldly uttered:
> [Redirecting to the hackers list -- please respect the reply-to header]
Sigh, well I guess I have another reason to join that list, what the
heck..
> > "Claus" == Claus Assmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Claus> On
pjklist> Funny thing about that, I actually created a /var/run/named directory
pjklist> for just the purpose of running named in a 'sandbox', chowned the
pjklist> directory bind:bind, and because I forgot to set the pid file path in
pjklist> named.conf, I see that it seems to write named.pid (o
On 27 May 2002, at 12:38, Gregory Neil Shapiro boldly uttered:
> pjklist> Funny thing about that, I actually created a /var/run/named directory
> pjklist> for just the purpose of running named in a 'sandbox', chowned the
> pjklist> directory bind:bind, and because I forgot to set the pid file
Jos Backus writes:
> As this thread once more suggests, the whole concept of pidfiles is broken.
> The proper way is to use a service control manager which keeps track of
> processes, allowing them to be stopped/restarted etc. through a single API. (I
I understand, but there no control manager now
On Tue, May 28, 2002 at 01:36:00AM +0400, "."@babolo.ru wrote:
> I have a lot of troubles with djb's tools in jail environment:
> they are unreliable.
Huh? What is the problem? While the license causes plenty of problems I have
yet to see the programs themselves cause any. Now they may not be a n
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Lyndon
Nerenberg writes
:
> [Redirecting to the hackers list -- please respect the reply-to header]
>
> > "Claus" == Claus Assmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Claus> On Mon, May 27, 2002, Philip J. Koenig wrote:
> >> Any particular reason why the
Jos Backus writes:
> On Tue, May 28, 2002 at 01:36:00AM +0400, "."@babolo.ru wrote:
> > I have a lot of troubles with djb's tools in jail environment:
> > they are unreliable.
> Huh? What is the problem? While the license causes plenty of problems I have
> yet to see the programs themselves cause
On Tue, May 28, 2002 at 03:42:31AM +0400, "."@babolo.ru wrote:
> There are usual retrieval errors in jail+nullfs
> on startup I never see without jail+nullfs.
> May be it is the reason for daemontools not to work
> reliable when nonexpected errors occur - but
> I am not shure because a lack of tim
On Mon, 2002-05-27 at 13:38, Gregory Neil Shapiro wrote:
> pjklist> Funny thing about that, I actually created a /var/run/named directory
> pjklist> for just the purpose of running named in a 'sandbox', chowned the
> pjklist> directory bind:bind, and because I forgot to set the pid file path in
Just fwiw (probably nothing), I'd like to express a strong "yes please"
vote for a move in this direction.
I currently use djb's daemontools to manage qmail and dnsserver+tinydns,
and am pretty sure that I'm going to migrate the rest of my
/usr/local/etc/rc.d services under there too, now that I
On Tue, May 28, 2002 at 03:42:31AM +0400, "."@babolo.ru wrote:
> Begin with port.
Please find attached a port skeleton for mktool 0.0.7. Perhaps we can suggest
a more descriptive name to the author (cc'ed)?
Feedback welcome.
--
Jos Backus _/ _/_/_/Santa Clara, CA
Jos Backus writes:
> On Tue, May 28, 2002 at 03:42:31AM +0400, "."@babolo.ru wrote:
> > Begin with port.
>
> Please find attached a port skeleton for mktool 0.0.7. Perhaps we can suggest
> a more descriptive name to the author (cc'ed)?
>
> Feedback welcome.
I doubt that goes to ports ever.
Make
On Wed, May 29, 2002 at 05:03:02AM +0400, "."@babolo.ru wrote:
> I doubt that goes to ports ever.
> Make Problem Report.
> man send-pr
Allright, allright :-)
But let me remind you that I don't want this to be a port, I want it to become
part of the base OS.
--
Jos Backus _/ _/
On Wed, May 29, 2002 at 05:03:02AM +0400, "."@babolo.ru wrote:
> I doubt that goes to ports ever.
> Make Problem Report.
ports/38674
--
Jos Backus _/ _/_/_/Santa Clara, CA
_/ _/ _/
_/ _/_/_/
16 matches
Mail list logo
