On Tue, Jan 21, 2003 at 08:02:59PM -0800, Matthew Dillon wrote:
> :You shouldn't modify vendor code for minor purposes.
> :
> :Kris
>
> The vendor code in question has been modified *extensively* since
> it was imported, (and of course I would give Darren a head's up in
> regards to i
:Didn't we explicitly make it like this? ie: you'd be backing out a
:previous set of intentional commits by doing this...
:
:Cheers,
:-Peter
:--
:Peter Wemm - [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'm not aware of anything like that. The MIN code appears to be
in rev 1.
Matthew Dillon wrote:
>
> :On Tue, Jan 21, 2003 at 07:25:44PM -0800, Matthew Dillon wrote:
> :> This patch is going to go in on the weekend unless someone has any
> :> worthwhile nits about it. It was submitted by Hiten Pandya.
> :
> :> Index: contrib/dev/oltr/if_oltr.c
> :
> :> Index: co
:On Tue, Jan 21, 2003 at 07:25:44PM -0800, Matthew Dillon wrote:
:> This patch is going to go in on the weekend unless someone has any
:> worthwhile nits about it. It was submitted by Hiten Pandya.
:
:> Index: contrib/dev/oltr/if_oltr.c
:
:> Index: contrib/ipfilter/netinet/ip_proxy.c
:
:>
On Tue, Jan 21, 2003 at 07:25:44PM -0800, Matthew Dillon wrote:
> This patch is going to go in on the weekend unless someone has any
> worthwhile nits about it. It was submitted by Hiten Pandya.
> Index: contrib/dev/oltr/if_oltr.c
> Index: contrib/ipfilter/netinet/ip_proxy.c
> Index: ne
This patch is going to go in on the weekend unless someone has any
worthwhile nits about it. It was submitted by Hiten Pandya.
The patch basically removes random MIN/MAX implementations from
22 files in the kernel and modifies the one in sys/param.h (see the
last part of the
6 matches
Mail list logo
