:
:On Tue, 21 Jan 2003, Matthew Dillon wrote:
:> This might be useful follow-up work. i.e. the idea of getting rid of
:> the use of the MIN and MAX macros in the kernel altogether. Though I'm
:> not sure I like the fact that 'min' and 'max' in sys/libkern.h refer to
:> unsigned ints (it really s
On Tue, 21 Jan 2003, Matthew Dillon wrote:
> This might be useful follow-up work. i.e. the idea of getting rid of
> the use of the MIN and MAX macros in the kernel altogether. Though I'm
> not sure I like the fact that 'min' and 'max' in sys/libkern.h refer to
> unsigned ints (it really should be
:I'd like to see all of these changed to the inlines in sys/libkern.h since
:the compiler will do type checking for us.
:
:This is a little more work which is why I didn't do it myself when I dealt
:with the abs() stuff.
:
:Consider this my objection.
:
:I don't think that it really stands in the
On Tue, 21 Jan 2003, Matthew Dillon wrote:
> This patch is going to go in on the weekend unless someone has any
> worthwhile nits about it. It was submitted by Hiten Pandya.
>
> The patch basically removes random MIN/MAX implementations from
> 22 files in the kernel and modifies th
4 matches
Mail list logo
