Does anybody know (remember?) why portmap_enable (the rc.conf knob)
wasn't renamed to rpcbind_enable when portmap became rpcbind? It
seems odd to have a knob called portmap_enable that actually starts
something called rpcbind (not to mention violating POLA).
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL
Dan Nelson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
In the last episode (Jul 31), Dima Dorfman said:
Does anybody know (remember?) why portmap_enable (the rc.conf knob)
wasn't renamed to rpcbind_enable when portmap became rpcbind? It
seems odd to have a knob called portmap_enable that actually starts
On Tue, Jul 31, 2001 at 08:33:59AM -0700, Dima Dorfman wrote:
Dan Nelson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
In the last episode (Jul 31), Dima Dorfman said:
Does anybody know (remember?) why portmap_enable (the rc.conf knob)
wasn't renamed to rpcbind_enable when portmap became rpcbind? It
On 31-Jul-01 Dima Dorfman wrote:
Does anybody know (remember?) why portmap_enable (the rc.conf knob)
wasn't renamed to rpcbind_enable when portmap became rpcbind? It
seems odd to have a knob called portmap_enable that actually starts
something called rpcbind (not to mention violating POLA).
On 31-Jul-01 David Malone wrote:
On Tue, Jul 31, 2001 at 08:33:59AM -0700, Dima Dorfman wrote:
Dan Nelson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
In the last episode (Jul 31), Dima Dorfman said:
Does anybody know (remember?) why portmap_enable (the rc.conf knob)
wasn't renamed to rpcbind_enable when
David Malone [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Tue, Jul 31, 2001 at 08:33:59AM -0700, Dima Dorfman wrote:
Dan Nelson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
In the last episode (Jul 31), Dima Dorfman said:
Does anybody know (remember?) why portmap_enable (the rc.conf knob)
wasn't renamed to
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] Dima Dorfman writes:
: Does anybody know (remember?) why portmap_enable (the rc.conf knob)
: wasn't renamed to rpcbind_enable when portmap became rpcbind? It
: seems odd to have a knob called portmap_enable that actually starts
: something called rpcbind (not to
* Dima Dorfman [EMAIL PROTECTED] [010731 10:53] wrote:
David Malone [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Tue, Jul 31, 2001 at 08:33:59AM -0700, Dima Dorfman wrote:
Dan Nelson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
In the last episode (Jul 31), Dima Dorfman said:
Does anybody know (remember?) why
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] Dima Dorfman writes:
: Does anybody know (remember?) why portmap_enable (the rc.conf knob)
: wasn't renamed to rpcbind_enable when portmap became rpcbind? It
: seems odd to have a knob called portmap_enable that actually starts
: something called rpcbind (not to
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] Brian Somers writes:
: In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] Dima Dorfman writes:
: : Does anybody know (remember?) why portmap_enable (the rc.conf knob)
: : wasn't renamed to rpcbind_enable when portmap became rpcbind? It
: : seems odd to have a knob called
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] Brian Somers writes:
: In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] Dima Dorfman writes:
: : Does anybody know (remember?) why portmap_enable (the rc.conf knob)
: : wasn't renamed to rpcbind_enable when portmap became rpcbind? It
: : seems odd to have a knob called
On Tue, Jul 31, 2001 at 10:26:06AM -0500, Dan Nelson wrote:
In the last episode (Jul 31), Dima Dorfman said:
Does anybody know (remember?) why portmap_enable (the rc.conf knob)
wasn't renamed to rpcbind_enable when portmap became rpcbind? It
seems odd to have a knob called portmap_enable
12 matches
Mail list logo