In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Balis George [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thank you very much John but it seems that my problem got solved
when i specified: ports-all instead of specifying individual ones.
Really?! OK, that's a good clue. I suspect the problem is one of
two things:
- You
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Balis George [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The last days I am trying to cvs both the latest stable source and the
latest ports from several servers. The problem is that when I am cvsing
the ports I get a segmentation faults and cvsup exits ungracefully
with a core
On Tue, Sep 12, 2000 at 12:51:15PM -0700, John Polstra wrote:
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Balis George [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The last days I am trying to cvs both the latest stable source and the
latest ports from several servers. The problem is that when I am cvsing
the ports I get
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Wilko Bulte [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Sep 12, 2000 at 12:51:15PM -0700, John Polstra wrote:
Illegal instruction faults may indicate that a thread stack
overflowed, or they might be symptomatic of HW or kernel problems.
Or an executable built with
On Tue, Sep 12, 2000 at 01:16:04PM -0700, John Polstra wrote:
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Wilko Bulte [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Sep 12, 2000 at 12:51:15PM -0700, John Polstra wrote:
Illegal instruction faults may indicate that a thread stack
overflowed, or they might be
On Tue, 12 Sep 2000, John Polstra wrote:
Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2000 12:51:15 -0700 (PDT)
From: John Polstra [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: ports cvsup
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Balis George [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The last days I am trying
6 matches
Mail list logo
