Re: sysctl hacks

* Poul-Henning Kamp [EMAIL PROTECTED] [040821 13:29] wrote: In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Alfred Perlstein writes: I'm doing some work that requires that I have a sysctl structure be passed around, but inside that structure are several pointers I may need to dereference. Basically:

Re: sysctl hacks

Alfred Perlstein wrote this message on Sat, Aug 21, 2004 at 23:47 -0700: * Poul-Henning Kamp [EMAIL PROTECTED] [040821 13:29] wrote: In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Alfred Perlstein writes: I'm doing some work that requires that I have a sysctl structure be passed around, but inside that

Re: sysctl hacks

* John-Mark Gurney [EMAIL PROTECTED] [040822 00:18] wrote: Alfred Perlstein wrote this message on Sat, Aug 21, 2004 at 23:47 -0700: I have a sysctl node that takes a struct like so: struct mysysctldata { (data here) struct moredata * vc_ptr; size_t len vc_len; }

sysctl hacks

I'm doing some work that requires that I have a sysctl structure be passed around, but inside that structure are several pointers I may need to dereference. Basically: struct mysysctldata { (data here) void *moredata; size_t morelen; }; What is the proper way of sysctl'ing IN the

Re: sysctl hacks

In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Alfred Perlstein writes: I'm doing some work that requires that I have a sysctl structure be passed around, but inside that structure are several pointers I may need to dereference. Basically: struct mysysctldata { (data here) void *moredata; size_t