Harti Brandt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> types:
> MM>Harti Brandt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> types:
> MM>> On Thu, 22 Nov 2001, Mike Meyer wrote:
> MM>> MM>Linux uses a device driver that's a directory full of files holding
> MM>> MM>sensor information. That doesn't seem to be the right direction for
> MM>> MM>F
On Thu, 22 Nov 2001, Harti Brandt wrote:
> What's bad about using files? Just to be different? Isn't it easier to
> select, poll, kqueue, what ever on files than on sysctls?
/proc files are horrible if you sample at reasonable rates, say 10-100 hz.
We found (on Linux, maybe fbsd is better) that
On Thu, Nov 22, 2001 at 05:51:10PM +0100, Harti Brandt wrote:
> Taking a Linux driver to argue against
> something doesn't really make sense. There is so many crap in the Linux
> kernel, that you can argue against anything: "The crappy unix domain
> sockets don't work in Linux. Oh yeah, they are a
On Fri, 23 Nov 2001, Joerg Micheel wrote:
JM>On Thu, Nov 22, 2001 at 12:08:16PM +0100, Harti Brandt wrote:
JM>> It's just annoying to need a special program to get at the values. For
JM>> some parts of the MIB, like the interface MIB, even sysctl doesn't help -
JM>> you need to write a program to
On Thu, Nov 22, 2001 at 12:08:16PM +0100, Harti Brandt wrote:
> It's just annoying to need a special program to get at the values. For
> some parts of the MIB, like the interface MIB, even sysctl doesn't help -
> you need to write a program to look at these. I still think, its easier to
> read the
On Thu, 22 Nov 2001, Mike Meyer wrote:
MM>Harti Brandt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> types:
MM>> On Thu, 22 Nov 2001, Mike Meyer wrote:
MM>> MM>Linux uses a device driver that's a directory full of files holding
MM>> MM>sensor information. That doesn't seem to be the right direction for
MM>> MM>FBSD, thoug
Harti Brandt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> types:
> On Thu, 22 Nov 2001, Mike Meyer wrote:
> MM>Linux uses a device driver that's a directory full of files holding
> MM>sensor information. That doesn't seem to be the right direction for
> MM>FBSD, though. An option that enabled a set of sysctls to collect t
On Thu, 22 Nov 2001, Mike Meyer wrote:
MM>In looking over the various options for monitoring the health of the
MM>hardware, I notice that it's pretty much a mess. All the software in
MM>question runs privileged and grovels through memory in some way.
MM>
MM>Linux uses a device driver that's a dir
In looking over the various options for monitoring the health of the
hardware, I notice that it's pretty much a mess. All the software in
question runs privileged and grovels through memory in some way.
Linux uses a device driver that's a directory full of files holding
sensor information. That d
9 matches
Mail list logo
