From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Dec 6 00:41:54 2001
Joerg Schilling writes:
.
STAR Option Description Gnu
tar equiv. Remarks
=== ===
= ===
Joerg Schilling writes:
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Dec 6 00:41:54 2001
Joerg Schilling writes:
.
STAR OptionDescription
Gnu tar equiv. Remarks
======
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Dec 3 20:27:24 2001
On Thu, Nov 29, 2001 at 09:07:03PM +0100, Joerg Schilling wrote:
- An idiosyncratic build system.
This is really funny
Please don't waste time on this issue. I can bmake and shoe-horn
anything into our build system.
Right, this is
Joerg Schilling writes:
.
STAR Option Description Gnu
tar equiv. Remarks
=== ===
= ===
.
file=nm,f=nm use 'nm' as tape instead
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Dec 6 00:41:54 2001
.
STAR Option Description Gnu
tar equiv. Remarks
=== ===
= ===
.
file=nm,f=nm use
On Thu, Nov 29, 2001 at 09:07:03PM +0100, Joerg Schilling wrote:
- An idiosyncratic build system.
This is really funny
Please don't waste time on this issue. I can bmake and shoe-horn
anything into our build system.
--
-- David ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
To Unsubscribe: send mail to
From: fergus [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Perhaps it makes sense to switch to star instead? The last version is
Posix conform, supports extended headers and ACLs. According to the star
developer (Joerg Schilling) GNU tar is severly broken.
Unfortunately, star has it's own share of problems:
- A
Of course, if you only know GNUtar Star's standard option handling
_may_ look strange. But then why did FreBSD switch to GNUtar instead
of keeping a real tar?
Because there didn't exist a real tar at the time that FreeBSD was
created.
Nate
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Nov 29 21:11:16 2001
Of course, if you only know GNUtar Star's standard option handling
_may_ look strange. But then why did FreBSD switch to GNUtar instead
of keeping a real tar?
Because there didn't exist a real tar at the time that FreeBSD was
created.
Well
Of course, if you only know GNUtar Star's standard option handling
_may_ look strange. But then why did FreBSD switch to GNUtar instead
of keeping a real tar?
Because there didn't exist a real tar at the time that FreeBSD was
created.
Well this is from BSD-4.3:
[ SNIP ]
... And it
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Nov 29 21:25:58 2001
Of course, if you only know GNUtar Star's standard option handling
_may_ look strange. But then why did FreBSD switch to GNUtar instead
of keeping a real tar?
Because there didn't exist a real tar at the time that FreeBSD was
created.
11 matches
Mail list logo
