-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
vasanth raonaik wrote:
Hello Hackers,
I am seeing this message continuously in syslog for every 60 secs. what
could be the possible reasons for this error messages.
Are you using an amd64 kernel? If so, you could try the attached patch.
I've
Hello Hackers,
I am seeing this message continuously in syslog for every 60 secs. what
could be the possible reasons for this error messages.
Thanks,
Vasanth
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
On Fri, Oct 21, 2005 at 05:10:39PM +0200, Harti Brandt wrote:
On Fri, 21 Oct 2005, Stijn Hoop wrote:
SHOn Fri, Oct 21, 2005 at 04:08:14PM +0200, Harti Brandt wrote:
SH I have enabled the pam_krb5 module in pam.d/{login,telnetd,sshd}. When
SH login in locally I get a Kerberos ticket as I would
Hi all,
I have enabled the pam_krb5 module in pam.d/{login,telnetd,sshd}. When
login in locally I get a Kerberos ticket as I would expect. When logging
in via ssh or telnet I don't get one. I have digged around in the sources
and it locks like telnetd never calls pam_setcred() which would do
On Fri, Oct 21, 2005 at 04:08:14PM +0200, Harti Brandt wrote:
I have enabled the pam_krb5 module in pam.d/{login,telnetd,sshd}. When
login in locally I get a Kerberos ticket as I would expect. When logging
in via ssh or telnet I don't get one. I have digged around in the sources
On Fri, 21 Oct 2005, Stijn Hoop wrote:
SHOn Fri, Oct 21, 2005 at 04:08:14PM +0200, Harti Brandt wrote:
SH I have enabled the pam_krb5 module in pam.d/{login,telnetd,sshd}. When
SH login in locally I get a Kerberos ticket as I would expect. When logging
SH in via ssh or telnet I don't get one. I
On Sat, 17 Jul 1999, Warner Losh wrote:
What purpose is served by the twisty maze of ifdefs in telnetd? I'd
like to unifdef many of them. I'm trying to track down a bug and the
twisty maze makes it very hard to follow. Comments?
There seem to be some fairly stupid ones in src/sbin too
Warner Losh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What purpose is served by the twisty maze of ifdefs in telnetd?
Probably for portability.
I'd
like to unifdef many of them. I'm trying to track down a bug and the
twisty maze makes it very hard to follow. Comments?
There's nothing stopping you unifdefing
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] Peter Jeremy writes:
: There's nothing stopping you unifdefing telnetd on your system. I
: have no opinion as to the merits (or otherwise) of leaving the
: ifdef's in the main code tree.
True, but since some of what I'm doing is making sure
Warner Losh i...@village.org wrote:
What purpose is served by the twisty maze of ifdefs in telnetd?
Probably for portability.
I'd
like to unifdef many of them. I'm trying to track down a bug and the
twisty maze makes it very hard to follow. Comments?
There's nothing stopping you unifdefing
In message 99jul19.084214est.40...@border.alcanet.com.au Peter Jeremy writes:
: There's nothing stopping you unifdefing telnetd on your system. I
: have no opinion as to the merits (or otherwise) of leaving the
: ifdef's in the main code tree.
True, but since some of what I'm doing is making
On Sun, Jul 18, 1999 at 05:44:39PM -0600, Warner Losh wrote:
True, but since some of what I'm doing is making sure that there are
no security implications to some of the paths, doing that would be
useless, since that wouldn't be what is checked into the system. We
really don't need the
What purpose is served by the twisty maze of ifdefs in telnetd? I'd
like to unifdef many of them. I'm trying to track down a bug and the
twisty maze makes it very hard to follow. Comments?
Warner
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org
with unsubscribe freebsd-hackers in the body
13 matches
Mail list logo
