Subject: Re: Re: userland program panics freebsd 4.3
On 2002-01-01 19:59 +, John Rochester [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Stefan Esser wrote:
Instead of the for loop, I'd rather have:
while(waitpid(pid, NULL, WNOHANG) == EINTR)
This should be
while (waitpid(pid, NULL, WNOHANG) 0
Message -
From: Stefan Esser [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: John Rochester [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Stefan Esser [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, January 01, 2002 5:25 PM
Subject: Re: Re: userland program panics freebsd 4.3
On 2002-01-01 19:59 +, John Rochester [EMAIL PROTECTED
On 2001-12-31 11:31 -0500, Michael Scheidell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
(The second method, used only if there is no PROCFS, is to call
kill(PID, 0), which will check if a signal could be delivered.
That method should probably be prefered to the reading of procfs
anyway, since the latter
Stefan Esser wrote:
Instead of the for loop, I'd rather have:
while(waitpid(pid, NULL, WNOHANG) == EINTR)
This should be
while (waitpid(pid, NULL, WNOHANG) 0 errno == EINTR)
/* do nothing */;
return kill(pid, 0) == 0;
--
John Rochester Software Architect, Merus
On 2002-01-01 19:59 +, John Rochester [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Stefan Esser wrote:
Instead of the for loop, I'd rather have:
while(waitpid(pid, NULL, WNOHANG) == EINTR)
This should be
while (waitpid(pid, NULL, WNOHANG) 0 errno == EINTR)
Yes, obviously ... ;-)
STefan
To
On 2001-12-18 15:29 -0500, Michael Scheidell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a userland program that canpanic/reboot a freebsd 4.3 system.
Hardware is Intel isp1100 (mbx440 motherboard) 850MHZ pIII, 256mb ram, 640mb
swapfile
software is 'nessusd' (network security scanner) hits the ethernet
I've had similar problems running nessus against a range of 32 class B
networks (i.e. 2mio addresses) with some 1 hosts expected to be
found. Since I need to complete the scan during the next two weeks
(it's running in batch mode right now; but I had trouble with hanging
nessusd
On 2001-12-31 10:29 -0500, Michael Scheidell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
as for hanging processes, this is probaly due to the bug in the FBSD
distributer libpcap, hanging on pcap_next().
IIRC, most processes were sleeping in select(). But truss revealed,
that some processes were running in a loop
http://www.FreeBSD.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=32681
The cause is a NULL pointer dereference in that fstatfs system
call, where some pointer hanging off a vnode is cleared. Nessusd
tries to read from /proc/PID (for PID = process IDs of plugins
spawned) in order to see whether some
Just an update:
userland probram panic's FBSD 4.3-REL, FBSD 4.4-REL and FBSD 4.4-STABLE.
its not hardware (unless two completly identicle systems have some type of
chip problem not known yet)
its not thermal problem (I can do make buildworld's all day long)
If I do find it, its easy to tell: I
* Michael Scheidell [EMAIL PROTECTED] [011227 14:26] wrote:
Just an update:
userland probram panic's FBSD 4.3-REL, FBSD 4.4-REL and FBSD 4.4-STABLE.
its not hardware (unless two completly identicle systems have some type of
chip problem not known yet)
Can you provide this program or a kernel
- Original Message -
From: Alfred Perlstein [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Michael Scheidell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: David Malone [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 3:31 PM
Subject: Re: userland program panics freebsd 4.3
* Michael Scheidell
* Michael Scheidell [EMAIL PROTECTED] [011227 14:34] wrote:
* Michael Scheidell [EMAIL PROTECTED] [011227 14:26] wrote:
Just an update:
userland probram panic's FBSD 4.3-REL, FBSD 4.4-REL and FBSD 4.4-STABLE.
its not hardware (unless two completly identicle systems have some type
of
- Original Message -
From: Alfred Perlstein [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Michael Scheidell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: David Malone [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 3:31 PM
Subject: Re: userland program panics freebsd 4.3
* Michael Scheidell
* Michael Scheidell [EMAIL PROTECTED] [011227 14:48] wrote:
same place as before:
0 fstatfs (p=0xce1bd260, uap=0xce216f80) at ../../kern/vfs_syscalls.c:684
684 error = VFS_STATFS(mp, sp, p);
680 if ((error = getvnode(p-p_fd, SCARG(uap, fd), fp)) != 0)
681
- Original Message -
From: Alfred Perlstein [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Michael Scheidell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 4:00 PM
Subject: Re: userland program panics freebsd 4.3
*mp, *sp, *p, *((struct vnode *)fp-f_data)
print *mp:
$1 = {mnt_list
* Michael Scheidell [EMAIL PROTECTED] [011227 15:11] wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Alfred Perlstein [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Michael Scheidell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 4:00 PM
Subject: Re: userland program panics freebsd 4.3
ok
I did this, and instead of crashing in 15 ins, its still running after 3
hours.
I will rerun tests and report back.
Thanks for the suggestion (now, if I cvsup RELENG_4_3 do I get the OLD
param.h?)
I think with cvsup you will get the old one back again. If you use
cvs it would preserve the
- Original Message -
From: Paul Halliday [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2001 10:08 PM
Subject: Re: userland program panics freebsd 4.3
On Thu, 20 Dec 2001, Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Thu, Dec 20, 2001 at 12:45
Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Thu, Dec 20, 2001 at 09:10:14AM -0500, Michael Scheidell wrote:
I doubt hardware related
I can get it to do it on two seperate boxes.
OK, then you need to get more details as explained.
My gut reaction tells me that this is either a kernel stack overflow or out
of
Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Thu, Dec 20, 2001 at 09:10:14AM -0500, Michael Scheidell wrote:
I doubt hardware related
I can get it to do it on two seperate boxes.
OK, then you need to get more details as explained.
My gut reaction tells me that this is either a kernel stack overflow
On Thu, Dec 20, 2001 at 07:14:08PM -0800, Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Thu, Dec 20, 2001 at 09:08:36PM -0600, Paul Halliday wrote:
On Thu, 20 Dec 2001, Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Thu, Dec 20, 2001 at 12:45:51PM -0500, Michael Scheidell wrote:
I'm not aware of any services that broke
On Fri, Dec 21, 2001 at 12:51:38PM -0500, Michael Scheidell wrote:
My gut reaction tells me that this is either a kernel stack overflow or out
of KVM. The kernel stack overflow problem was fixed in 4.4-STABLE some
time back (change UPAGES from 2 to 3 in the kernel) so that the kernel stack
- Original Message -
From: David Malone [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Michael Scheidell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 1:18 PM
Subject: Re: userland program panics freebsd 4.3
On Fri, Dec 21, 2001 at 12:51:38PM -0500, Michael
I doubt hardware related
I can get it to do it on two seperate boxes.
Updating to freebsd 4.4 is a bad option, with all the reported ports and
services broken.
--
Michael Scheidell
Secnap Network Security, LLC
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 1+(561) 368-9561
See updated IT Security News at http://www.fdma.com/
Michael Scheidell [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I doubt hardware related
I can get it to do it on two seperate boxes.
Updating to freebsd 4.4 is a bad option, with all the reported ports and
services broken.
I'm not aware of any services that broke between 4.3 and 4.4. Care to
elaborate?
Best
I'm not aware of any services that broke between 4.3 and 4.4. Care to
elaborate?
scan through freebsd-questions, freebsd-mobile and freebsd-ports
as for moving to fbsd 4.4 for a 'maybe' fix of something that might still
show up in 4.4 (according to other posts)
this seems to be in the
On Thu, Dec 20, 2001 at 09:10:14AM -0500, Michael Scheidell wrote:
I doubt hardware related
I can get it to do it on two seperate boxes.
OK, then you need to get more details as explained.
Updating to freebsd 4.4 is a bad option, with all the reported ports and
services broken.
I'm not
On Thu, Dec 20, 2001 at 12:45:51PM -0500, Michael Scheidell wrote:
I'm not aware of any services that broke between 4.3 and 4.4. Care to
elaborate?
scan through freebsd-questions, freebsd-mobile and freebsd-ports
That's completely non-helpful. I read -questions and -ports, and
don't
* Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] [011220 19:56] wrote:
On Thu, Dec 20, 2001 at 09:10:14AM -0500, Michael Scheidell wrote:
I doubt hardware related
I can get it to do it on two seperate boxes.
OK, then you need to get more details as explained.
Updating to freebsd 4.4 is a bad option,
On Thu, 20 Dec 2001, Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Thu, Dec 20, 2001 at 12:45:51PM -0500, Michael Scheidell wrote:
I'm not aware of any services that broke between 4.3 and 4.4. Care to
elaborate?
scan through freebsd-questions, freebsd-mobile and freebsd-ports
That's completely
Paul Halliday [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
My soundcard on my lappy has been broken since 4.4. And to be
brutally honest, it's really starting to piss me off.
Enough to open a PR?
Best regards,
Mike Barcroft
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-hackers
On Thu, Dec 20, 2001 at 09:08:36PM -0600, Paul Halliday wrote:
On Thu, 20 Dec 2001, Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Thu, Dec 20, 2001 at 12:45:51PM -0500, Michael Scheidell wrote:
I'm not aware of any services that broke between 4.3 and 4.4. Care to
elaborate?
scan through
On Thu, 20 Dec 2001, Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Thu, Dec 20, 2001 at 09:08:36PM -0600, Paul Halliday wrote:
On Thu, 20 Dec 2001, Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Thu, Dec 20, 2001 at 12:45:51PM -0500, Michael Scheidell wrote:
I'm not aware of any services that broke between 4.3 and 4.4.
Paul Halliday [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Due to my limited intelligence and poor cognitive skills I
consider a PR to be a waste until someone that actually knows what they
are doing reports the same problem.
The card compiles, works like a charm. However, No mixer control
with
On Thu, Dec 20, 2001 at 09:26:53PM -0600, Paul Halliday wrote:
My soundcard on my lappy has been broken since 4.4. And to be
brutally honest, it's really starting to piss me off.
Which PR contains your bug report? I couldn't see one.
Kris
Due to my limited intelligence
:I have a userland program that canpanic/reboot a freebsd 4.3 system.
:Hardware is Intel isp1100 (mbx440 motherboard) 850MHZ pIII, 256mb ram, 640mb
:swapfile
:software is 'nessusd' (network security scanner) hits the ethernet port
:pretty hard when running.
:If I read the dumpdev right, it is
Kris Kennaway wrote:
OK, so what you're saying is that you haven't even tried to report the
problem such that it can be fixed. I don't think it's fair to hold
your lack of communication about your problem against the FreeBSD
sound developers; if you want this to get fixed then you really
On Tue, Dec 18, 2001 at 03:29:17PM -0500, Michael Scheidell wrote:
I have a userland program that canpanic/reboot a freebsd 4.3 system.
Can you upgrade to 4.4-STABLE and test whether the problem persists?
Chances are it's either a) fixed, or b) hardware-related.
Kris
msg30305/pgp0.pgp
I have a userland program that canpanic/reboot a freebsd 4.3 system.
Hardware is Intel isp1100 (mbx440 motherboard) 850MHZ pIII, 256mb ram, 640mb
swapfile
software is 'nessusd' (network security scanner) hits the ethernet port
pretty hard when running.
If I read the dumpdev right, it is crashing
40 matches
Mail list logo
