Re: vfs.vmiodirenable undocumented

2001-07-11 Thread Zhihui Zhang
, when you get something free, you should be grateful and not complain its quality because you have not paid for it. -Zhihui On Wed, 11 Jul 2001, Jordan Hubbard wrote: > From: Sheldon Hearn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: vfs.vmiodirenable undocumented > Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2001

Re: vfs.vmiodirenable undocumented

2001-07-11 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Wed, Jul 11, 2001 at 11:21:24AM +0200, Sheldon Hearn wrote: > I'm very concerned with the fact that this style of response has become > commonly accepted within the FreeBSD community. > > Yes, we like patches. Yes, in this case the only reason we don't have > what David requested is that nob

Re: vfs.vmiodirenable undocumented

2001-07-11 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Wed, Jul 11, 2001 at 09:14:18AM +0800, David Xu wrote: > but why hasn't a complete sysctl manual? > I see OpenBSD has a better sysctl manual, our sysctl(8) is too bad, > except the command usage info is useful, all left is garbage > information and waste disk space. Submit something please..c

Re: vfs.vmiodirenable undocumented

2001-07-11 Thread Jordan Hubbard
From: Sheldon Hearn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: vfs.vmiodirenable undocumented Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2001 11:21:24 +0200 > I'm very concerned with the fact that this style of response has become > commonly accepted within the FreeBSD community. I would have to disagree that t

Re: vfs.vmiodirenable undocumented

2001-07-11 Thread Bruce A. Mah
If memory serves me right, Sheldon Hearn wrote: > > > On Tue, 10 Jul 2001 18:24:50 MST, "Bruce A. Mah" wrote: > > > I'm sorry, I missed the part of your message containing the patches to > > fix this problem. > > Bruce, I'm using your message as an example because you're good at > shrugging s

Re: vfs.vmiodirenable undocumented

2001-07-11 Thread Sheldon Hearn
On Tue, 10 Jul 2001 18:24:50 MST, "Bruce A. Mah" wrote: > I'm sorry, I missed the part of your message containing the patches to > fix this problem. Bruce, I'm using your message as an example because you're good at shrugging stuff like this off. :-) I'm very concerned with the fact that thi

Re: vfs.vmiodirenable undocumented

2001-07-10 Thread Bruce A. Mah
If memory serves me right, "David Xu" wrote: > but why hasn't a complete sysctl manual? > I see OpenBSD has a better sysctl manual, our sysctl(8) is too bad, > except the command usage info is useful, all left is garbage > information and waste disk space. I'm sorry, I missed the part of your me

Re: vfs.vmiodirenable undocumented

2001-07-10 Thread Alfred Perlstein
* David Xu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010710 20:10] wrote: > but why hasn't a complete sysctl manual? > I see OpenBSD has a better sysctl manual, our sysctl(8) is too bad, > except the command usage info is useful, all left is garbage > information and waste disk space. David, I know you're busy writi

Re: vfs.vmiodirenable undocumented

2001-07-10 Thread David Xu
TED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, July 10, 2001 8:21 PM Subject: Re: vfs.vmiodirenable undocumented > > > On Tue, 10 Jul 2001 14:13:23 +0200, Sheldon Hearn wrote: > > > Someone recently suggested that I tune vfs.vmiodirenable on a system > > with lot

Re: vfs.vmiodirenable undocumented

2001-07-10 Thread Sheldon Hearn
On Tue, 10 Jul 2001 14:13:23 +0200, Sheldon Hearn wrote: > Someone recently suggested that I tune vfs.vmiodirenable on a system > with lots of memory. The CVS commit logs and the source tell me > absolutely nothing about what this tunable does. > > Is anyone in a position to document it? Som

vfs.vmiodirenable undocumented

2001-07-10 Thread Sheldon Hearn
Someone recently suggested that I tune vfs.vmiodirenable on a system with lots of memory. The CVS commit logs and the source tell me absolutely nothing about what this tunable does. Is anyone in a position to document it? Ciao, Sheldon. To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "uns