On Fri, Jun 30, 2000 at 09:16:33AM +0200, Rasmus Skaarup wrote:
> By 'odd', you mean small, Søren? If this is the case, be careful not to
> make the size too small, which will degrade the perfomance because of the
I presumed he ment 'odd' as in 'not even'
David.
To Unsubscribe: s
On Friday, 30 June 2000 at 9:16:33 +0200, Rasmus Skaarup wrote:
> On Fri, 30 Jun 2000, Soren Schmidt wrote:
>
>> It seems Jaye Mathisen wrote:
>>>
>>> I have 8 75GB IBM drives striped in a big raid 0 for monkeying with.
>>>
>>> newfs -i 131072 -v /dev/vinum/bighonkindisk seems to very nicely put
Rasmus Skaarup wrote:
> By 'odd', you mean small, Søren? If this is the case, be careful not to
> make the size too small, which will degrade the perfomance because of
> the
.. beacuse of the drive geometry.
Best regards
Rasmus
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubsc
On Fri, 30 Jun 2000, Soren Schmidt wrote:
> It seems Jaye Mathisen wrote:
> >
> > I have 8 75GB IBM drives striped in a big raid 0 for monkeying with.
> >
> > newfs -i 131072 -v /dev/vinum/bighonkindisk seems to very nicely put all
> > the data that newfs write out on to the first disk... It l
It seems Jaye Mathisen wrote:
> Not sure what the right thing to do here is, or even if it's a real
> problem, but:
>
> I have 8 75GB IBM drives striped in a big raid 0 for monkeying with.
>
> newfs -i 131072 -v /dev/vinum/bighonkindisk seems to very nicely put all
> the data that newfs write ou
Not sure what the right thing to do here is, or even if it's a real
problem, but:
I have 8 75GB IBM drives striped in a big raid 0 for monkeying with.
newfs -i 131072 -v /dev/vinum/bighonkindisk seems to very nicely put all
the data that newfs write out on to the first disk... It least, only
6 matches
Mail list logo
