Just a quick question: What would it take to have similar functionality to the
IPv4 tables in ipfw for v6? Is there a specific reason it isn't there (other
than the fact that I haven't got my finger out and learnt the neccessary to
add it myself ;) )?
--
Matt Dawson.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
MTD15-RI
On Tuesday 05 August 2008 16:33:04 Matt Dawson wrote:
> Just a quick question: What would it take to have similar functionality to
> the IPv4 tables in ipfw for v6? Is there a specific reason it isn't there
> (other than the fact that I haven't got my finger out and learnt the
> neccessary to add i
On Tuesday 05 August 2008 16:42:25 Max Laier wrote:
> On Tuesday 05 August 2008 16:33:04 Matt Dawson wrote:
> > Just a quick question: What would it take to have similar functionality
> > to the IPv4 tables in ipfw for v6? Is there a specific reason it isn't
> > there (other than the fact that I ha
I have a problem at the scheme:
( gw ) <-> ( nat_router ) <-> ( https )
real.ip0real.ip1 10.19.90.110.19.90.2
If I use ipfw+natd on nat_router then redirect to https server and to
nat_router local address 10.19.90.1 is well, but if ipfw+nat - redirect to
nat_ro
I have a problem at the scheme:
( gw ) <-> ( nat_router ) <-> ( https )
real.ip0real.ip1 10.19.90.110.19.90.2
If I use ipfw+natd on nat_router then redirect to https server and to
nat_router local address 10.19.90.1 is well, but if ipfw+nat - redirect to
nat_r
Matt Dawson wrote:
Just a quick question: What would it take to have similar functionality to the
IPv4 tables in ipfw for v6? Is there a specific reason it isn't there (other
than the fact that I haven't got my finger out and learnt the neccessary to
add it myself ;) )?
there is no reason exc
