On 2011-Feb-20 01:39:00 +0100, Pawel Tyll wrote:
>Since nobody came up with any interest in having this properly
>investigated, then I suppose I'm the only one that uses dummynet for
>some larger-scale traffic shaping - maybe that's my mistake?
I'm using dummpnet+pf (not ipfw) on (roughly) FreeBS
> addresses not needed, thanks. From what i saw in the backtrace, the panic
> occurred on an incoming packet on the 'antispoof' option.
> The ruleset confirms the backtrace, but since
> 'antispoof' happens
> to be run on every packet given it is on the first rule,
> it apparently has nothing to do
On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 12:13:12AM +0100, Pawel Tyll wrote:
> > understood. I am just saying that for instance the vlan presence and
> > changes is quite significant in this context.
> > You say vlans are "pretty much static" but can you tell us who adds/remove
> > them, assign addresses ?
> It's
> understood. I am just saying that for instance the vlan presence and
> changes is quite significant in this context.
> You say vlans are "pretty much static" but can you tell us who adds/remove
> them, assign addresses ?
It's not that much work and changes are simple and far between. I do
that p
On Sun, Feb 20, 2011 at 11:50:28PM +0100, Pawel Tyll wrote:
...
> This machine is only doing dummynet traffic shaping from significant
> things (otherwise it runs a dhcpd, ntpd and named). It's pretty
> straight-forward routing, packets come in, packets come out via static
> routes - there are curr
> The way a problem is presented has a big impact on how it gets handled:
> in this specific case the poster is pointing out a possible culprit
> (which may be helpful or misleading), and gives no hint on other
> things that may be relevant: number of interfaces, vlans, tunnels, taps,
> bpf etc ? a
On Sun, Feb 20, 2011 at 04:54:34AM +0100, Pawel Tyll wrote:
> > I've never seen a trace like this, and no absolutely nothing about
> > dummynet, sorry.
> > If it is in some way em's fault, then making sure you have the latest code
> > would be
> > a good idea. I have a test driver that is under s
