On 7/29/15 3:43 AM, Lev Serebryakov wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 28.07.2015 08:30, Ian Smith wrote:
I have global lack of any spare time (and all my FreeBSD activity is
only a hobby) for last ~2 months. I see the end of this unfortunate
state of affairs in near fu
*Hi Julian,*
*So below are the rules in your example*
*5 skipto 10 from A to B*
*6 skipto 11 from any to any*
*10{action} from A to B keep-state*
*11{action} from C to D*
*If I remove the "skipto" rules they will become*
*10 {action} from A to B keep-state*
*11 {action} from C to D *
*Correc
On 7/29/15 5:26 PM, bycn82 wrote:
/Hi Julian,/
/
/
/So below are the rules in your example/
/
/
/5 skipto 10 from A to B
/
/6 skipto 11 from any to any/
/10{action} from A to B keep-state/
/11{action} from C to D/
/
/
/
/
/If I remove the "skipto" rules they will become/
//
/10 {action} from A to
*Hi,*
*But I dont understand why you said C->D is already in the dynamic table?
which line create the dynamic rule for it?*
*Regards,*
*bycn82*
On 29 July 2015 at 22:03, Julian Elischer wrote:
> On 7/29/15 5:26 PM, bycn82 wrote:
>
> *Hi Julian,*
>
> *So below are the rules in your example*
On 7/29/15 10:23 PM, bycn82 wrote:
/Hi,/
/But I dont understand why you said C->D is already in the dynamic
table? which line create the dynamic rule for it?/
/it happened on a previous packet at some other rule, for example
30 allow ip from any to D 80 keep-state
/
/
/
/Regards,/
/bycn82
On 7/30/15 3:34 AM, Julian Elischer wrote:
On 7/29/15 10:23 PM, bycn82 wrote:
/Hi,/
/But I dont understand why you said C->D is already in the dynamic
table? which line create the dynamic rule for it?/
/it happened on a previous packet at some other rule, for example
30 allow ip from any to
