Re: [RFC] ipfw named states support

2016-05-29 Thread Julian Elischer
On 26/05/2016 6:11 PM, Dmitry Selivanov wrote: 18.05.2016 17:46, Andrey V. Elsukov пишет: We have the patch that adds named states support to ipfw. The idea is that we add a symbolic name-label to each dynamic state in addition to IP addresses, protocol and ports. This introduces new syntax for

Re: [RFC] ipfw named states support

2016-05-29 Thread Julian Elischer
On 18/05/2016 10:46 PM, Andrey V. Elsukov wrote: Hi All, We have the patch that adds named states support to ipfw. like it and have wished for this for along time this allows per-interface state. Can state name be set to a variable we can set or something? then we could have subroutines tha