On 26/05/2016 6:11 PM, Dmitry Selivanov wrote:
18.05.2016 17:46, Andrey V. Elsukov пишет:
We have the patch that adds named states support to ipfw.
The idea is that we add a symbolic name-label to each dynamic state in
addition to IP addresses, protocol and ports.
This introduces new syntax for
On 18/05/2016 10:46 PM, Andrey V. Elsukov wrote:
Hi All,
We have the patch that adds named states support to ipfw.
like it and have wished for this for along time
this allows per-interface state. Can state name be set to a variable
we can set or something?
then we could have subroutines tha