misleading I think.
John
--
John Hay -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] / [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Index: ip_fw2.c
===
RCS file: /home/ncvs/src/sys/netinet/ip_fw2.c,v
retrieving revision 1.106.2.13
diff -u -r1.106.2.13 ip_fw2.c
--- ip_fw2.c2 Jun 2006 04:02
() not be bigger? And the more important question, should
it not have some bounds checking?
John
--
John Hay -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] / [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ipfw
To
Synopsis: [patch] ipfw & kernel problems where firewall rules aren't
interpreted correctly
State-Changed-From-To: open->closed
State-Changed-By: jhay
State-Changed-When: Sat Sep 30 14:15:01 UTC 2006
State-Changed-Why:
Committed the fixes by Andrey for parts 1 and 3. Part 2 was already fixed.
Als
/* According to RFC2765 3.1 offset can be 0 */
args->f_id.frag_id6 =
ntohl(((struct ip6_frag *)ulp)->ip6f_ident);
ulp = NULL;
John
--
John
here it is going out and not in. Fwd only works
when packets are out bound.
John
--
John Hay -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] / [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ipfw
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 08:47:12AM +0400, Roman Kurakin wrote:
> John Hay wrote:
> >On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 11:19:22PM +0200, Leander S. wrote:
> >
> >>Hi,
> >>
> >>I'm trying to set up something like a HotSpot. Goal is it to force
> &g
sys/netinet/ip_fw.h /usr/include
> fbsd1# ll /usr/include | grep ip_fw.h
> -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 20916 May 8 02:04 ip_fw.h
>
You are looking in the wrong place:
# find /usr/include -name ip_fw.h
/usr/include/netinet/ip_fw.h
That is the file you should replace.
John
--
John Hay -
Hi,
What would the proper ipfw rules be to make nat work and properly get the
icmp too big packets back to a local host if the wan interface needs a
smaller mtu?
I'm using a FreeBSD machine as router/firewall, but its wan interface needs
a smaller mtu (1392) than the default ethernet mtu. I have
int accumulate, accumulate2;
struct in_addr original_address;
On Wed, 7 Dec 2022 at 16:33, John Hay wrote:
> Hi,
>
> What would the proper ipfw rules be to make nat work and properly get the
> icmp too big packets back to a local host if t
