IPFW and ToS PRECEDENCE fields.

.diff NOTE: IPFW have a short implementation called TOK_IPPRECEDENCE which implements some 0xe0 offset(NETWORK CONTROL), but I wrote TOK_IPTOSPRE like a test. Thanks and best regards, -- Marcelo Araujo(__) [EMAIL PROTECTED] \\\'',) http://www.FreeBSD.org \/ \ ^

kern/95084: [ipfw] [patch] IPFW2 ignores "recv/xmit/via any" (IPFW1->2 regression)

The following reply was made to PR kern/95084; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Marcelo Araujo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Subject: kern/95084: [ipfw] [patch] IPFW2 ignores "recv/xmit/via any" (IPFW1->2 regression) Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2008 08:31:50 -0300

[Fwd: Re: kern/121122: [ipfw] [patch] add support to ToS IP PRECEDENCE fields]

showed. I've some time(5 months) to make my project degree[1] and apply my research within of IPFW. Yes, I've interest to work around this function, this work help me for my degree project. I think also this work is a good opportunity to work in SoC 2008. [1] http://code.google.com/p/e

Re: kern/121122: [ipfw] [patch] add support to ToS IP PRECEDENCE fields

showed. I've some time(5 months) to make my project degree[1] and apply my research within of IPFW. Yes, I've interest to work around this function, this work help me for my degree project. I think also this work is a good opportunity to work in SoC 2008. [1] http://code.google.com/p

Re: kern/121122: [ipfw] [patch] add support to ToS IP PRECEDENCE fields

Andrey V. Elsukov wrote: > Marcelo Araujo wrote: >> Yes, I've interest to work around this function, this work help me for >> my degree project. >> I think also this work is a good opportunity to work in SoC 2008. > > I think this work is too easy for the SoC&#x

ipfw modip [DF|TOS|DSCP|TTL]

tion I've this output: island# ipfw add modip ipfw: need modip [DF|TOS|DSCP|TTL] arg and island# ipfw add modip tos TOS.... ipfw: invalid flag tos I'd like to pass as follows: island# ipfw add modip tos flashover ip from any to any My problem I believe are in fill_cmd(). Somebod

ipfw with modip().

dscp:af14 ip from 192.168.0.0/16 to any via xl0 I continue to work within modip(), now I begin to implement another patchs related with QoS in layer IP: kern/102471, kern/103454 and kern/121122. I'd like some opinions around this concern and suggestions. Best Regards, -- Marcelo A

Re: ipfw with modip().

Vadim Goncharov wrote: > > Agreed with syntax. But what about TTL?.. > > Haaa, TTL is included too, but I forgot to include in this message. -- Marcelo Araujo(__) [EMAIL PROTECTED] \\\'',) http://www.FreeBSD.org \/ \ ^ Power To Server. .\.

ipfw modip

look and point where I did an error. The patch are at: http://people.freebsd.org/~araujo/logs/modip.diff Best Regards, -- Marcelo Araujo(__) [EMAIL PROTECTED] \\\'',) http://www.FreeBSD.org \/ \ ^ Power To Server. .\. /_) signature.asc Description:

Re: [HEADS UP!] IPFW Ideas: possible SoC 2008 candidate

modip ippre:immediate ip from any to any 00011 52 5035 modip df:0 ip from any to any 3) DSCP: With the DSCP I've some errors but I believe that I fix it on this week. 4) ToS: I start the work on the next week. The patch: http://people.freebsd.org/~araujo/logs/ipfw-modi

Re: [HEADS UP!] IPFW Ideas: possible SoC 2008 candidate

free to re-work the patch. Just like the really the most important thing is the *modip*, I'm happy that you work within this idea. I'd like to see *modip* committed. I continue to my research and if I've some time to work with ipfw or another mechanism that have some relation wi

Re: [HEADS UP!] IPFW Ideas: possible SoC 2008 candidate

ression about modip()? You see some time to work with him? I've some time again to work around modip(), you can help me? Tell me more in what you worked on last week, you did some tests, I can start again the work of where I stoped? Best Regards, -- Marcelo Araujo(__)

Re: TOS/DSCP

implementation. Patch of MODIP: http://people.freebsd.org/~araujo/logs/ipfw-modip20080324.diff How you can use that: ipfw add 10 modip tos:lowdelay ip from any to any ipfw add 11 modip dscp:af14 ip from any to any ipfw add 12 modip ippre:flash ip from any to any Bye for now, Best Regards, --

Re: ipfw dscp support

ain! > Alan > ___ > freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ipfw > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ipfw-unsubscr...@freebsd.org" > -- Marcelo Araujo ara...@fre

Re: ipfw dscp support

; supposed to work? > > Hi Ian, Here is the patch: http://people.freebsd.org/~araujo/logs/ipfw/ipfw-modip20080324.diff Also it include an update on manpage that explain how use the modip. Best Regards, -- Marcelo Araujo ara...@freebsd.org __

Re: ipfw dscp support

2011/12/8 Ian Smith > On Thu, 8 Dec 2011, Marcelo Araujo wrote: > > 2011/12/8 Ian Smith > > .. but I couldn't find that? > > Hi Ian, Here bellow there are some examples how you can use the modip: *ipfw add 10 modip tos:lowdelay ip from any to any ipfw add 11 modip ds

Re: [patch] setting/matching DSCP with ipfw

p ippre:flash ip from any to any* Also, there are some discussion around "modip" you can google it. Here is some patches, also the modip implementation: http://people.freebsd.org/~araujo/ipfw_patchs/ Best Regards, -- Marcelo Araujo ara...@freebsd.org _

Re: HEADS UP: Merging projects/ipfw to HEAD

ns for parsing text string into "struct > ip_fw" and printing "struct ip_fw" to supplied buffer (already merged). > * Probably some more less significant/forgotten features > > ___ > freebsd-curr...@freebsd.org mailing