Need help for dummynet

2006-01-02 Thread budsz
se with clarification (step by step). FYI, I use FreeBSD 4.10-RELEASE & FreeBSD 4.11-STABLE. Thanks You. -- budsz ___ freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ipfw To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

Help about dynamic rule Dummynet

2006-09-21 Thread budsz
.1 using accelerator to download large file and splited to 5 file simultantly, the client's (192.168.0.10 - 192.168.0.14) will exhausted bandwidht. How to resolve this problem, any suggestion? TIA -- budsz ___ freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ipfw To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

Need help to convert rule iptables to ipfw

2007-01-09 Thread budsz
hat if use ipfw2. Does ipfw support feature PREROUTING/POSTROUTING like iptables on Linux system?. Thanks you. -- budsz ___ freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ipfw To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

Syntax base IP

2008-05-04 Thread budsz
.93.247.26/29?. But already same on $ipunlimit variable like 202.93.20.22/32 and 202.93.20.23/32 this is no problem. Any clue or suggestion about this syntax? Thanks You -- budsz ___ freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman

Question for Dummynet

2012-01-06 Thread budsz
oad=48Kbit/s. IMHO, this rule working for FreeBSD 7.1 - 7.2 STABLE, 3 days ago I do "make world" and problem showing. Now, My system running FreeBSD 7.4-STABLE Thank for your time. -- budsz ___ freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org mailing list http://

IPFW transparent VS dummynet rules

2012-01-06 Thread budsz
fint0} The limiter working but fwd didn't work. Anyone have a clue for fix this dilemma? Thank You -- budsz ___ freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ipfw To unsubscribe, send any mail to &qu

Re: IPFW transparent VS dummynet rules

2012-01-08 Thread budsz
On Sun, Jan 8, 2012 at 1:00 PM, Ian Smith wrote: > On Sat, 7 Jan 2012, budsz wrote: > [..] >  > >             keyword instead of an explicit address.  The search > terminates if >  > >             this rule matches. >  > > >  > > Note particular