Andrey V. Elsukov wrote: > Hi, Marcelo. > > I talked to Roman when he submitted his first patch about > it's design. What you think about making TOK_SETIPTOSPRE not > an action, but a modifier? I think it will be much usable. > A syntax example: > > # ipfw add allow iptospre flashover ip from any to any > # ipfw add count iptospre immediate ip from anyt to any > # ipfw add skipto .... > > Also I talked to Roman about extensible variant of this ability. > A syntax example: > > <action> [{modip [DF|TOS|DSCP|TTL]}] <rule body> > > Also look into: > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=kern/102471 > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=kern/103454 > > I added to CC several men who are active in ipfw area. > It will be interested what you think about this? >
Hi dear Andrey, I think about the TOK_SETIPTOSPRE as a modifier, that set the IP PRECEDENCE in the package. The second rule: # ipfw add count iptospre immediate ip from any to any Makes more sense for me, many users have ability to work with this syntax. I believe be a good idea an extensible variant to apply and sort some QoS models in layer IP, as you showed. I've some time(5 months) to make my project degree[1] and apply my research within of IPFW. Yes, I've interest to work around this function, this work help me for my degree project. I think also this work is a good opportunity to work in SoC 2008. [1] http://code.google.com/p/exports/w/list Best Regards, -- Marcelo Araujo (__) [EMAIL PROTECTED] \\\'',) http://www.FreeBSD.org \/ \ ^ Power To Server. .\. /_)
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature