All I have is one packet!

2007-08-06 Thread Eduardo Meyer
Hello ipfw users and hackers. I have tried, for many weeks, ng_tag to tag packets for ipfw filtering. I could make it work fine. However, I have one problem. I want to make a state that will match any packet, on any protocol, between the peers. Why? Because all I have, is one packet. And this

Re: All I have is one packet!

2007-08-08 Thread Vadim Goncharov
06.08.07 @ 23:05 Eduardo Meyer wrote: I have tried, for many weeks, ng_tag to tag packets for ipfw filtering. I could make it work fine. However, I have one problem. I want to make a state that will match any packet, on any protocol, between the peers. Why? Because all I have, is one packet

Re: All I have is one packet!

2007-08-19 Thread Eduardo Meyer
will match any packet, on any protocol, > > between the peers. Why? Because all I have, is one packet. And this > > packet however, wont always be in the same transport protocol. > > > > For example, I can identify session initialization on TCP packets, but > > once

Re: All I have is one packet!

2007-08-20 Thread Vadim Goncharov
19.08.07 @ 21:51 Eduardo Meyer wrote: Yes, dynamic rules in ipfw are not intended for supporting state created in the middle of the session, wuth the default sysctl settings it will be kept for 1 second (which, however, is enough for shaping of fast transfers). I think, precise controlling of