On Sun, 16 Jan 2011, Ian Smith wrote:
> On Sun, 16 Jan 2011, Hiroki Sato wrote:
> > Ian Smith wrote
> > in <20110108220300.q15...@sola.nimnet.asn.au>:
> >
> > sm> On Sat, 8 Jan 2011 15:02:29 +1100, Ian Smith wrote:
> > sm> > On Fri, 7 Jan 2011, Brandon Gooch wrote:
> > sm> > > O
On Sun, 16 Jan 2011, Hiroki Sato wrote:
> Ian Smith wrote
> in <20110108220300.q15...@sola.nimnet.asn.au>:
>
> sm> On Sat, 8 Jan 2011 15:02:29 +1100, Ian Smith wrote:
> sm> > On Fri, 7 Jan 2011, Brandon Gooch wrote:
> sm> > > On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 8:58 AM, Ian Smith
> wrote:
> sm
Ian Smith wrote
in <20110108220300.q15...@sola.nimnet.asn.au>:
sm> On Sat, 8 Jan 2011 15:02:29 +1100, Ian Smith wrote:
sm> > On Fri, 7 Jan 2011, Brandon Gooch wrote:
sm> > > On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 8:58 AM, Ian Smith
wrote:
sm> [..]
sm> > > > We could:
sm> > > >
sm> > > > 1) Preferen
On Sat, 8 Jan 2011 15:02:29 +1100, Ian Smith wrote:
> On Fri, 7 Jan 2011, Brandon Gooch wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 8:58 AM, Ian Smith wrote:
[..]
> > > We could:
> > >
> > > 1) Preference kernel nat over natd when both are enabled.
> >
> > I vote for #1.
>
> Thanks. So fa
On Fri, 7 Jan 2011, Brandon Gooch wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 8:58 AM, Ian Smith wrote:
> > Folks,
> >
> > [ If someone implements an /etc/rc.d/ipfw reload command that reliably
> > works over a remote session without any open firewall window, great, but
> > I'd rather not discuss the r
On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 8:58 AM, Ian Smith wrote:
> Folks,
>
> [ If someone implements an /etc/rc.d/ipfw reload command that reliably
> works over a remote session without any open firewall window, great, but
> I'd rather not discuss the related issues below in reponses to any PR ]
>
> In order to
Folks,
[ If someone implements an /etc/rc.d/ipfw reload command that reliably
works over a remote session without any open firewall window, great, but
I'd rather not discuss the related issues below in reponses to any PR ]
In order to address issues (and PRs) introduced by and since adding
ker
