On Fri, 5 Jan 2001, Sean wrote:
> >
> > Is gateway_enable turned on ? Is firewalling turned on? If
> > so, what do your rules look like? Is natd enabled?
>
> In /etc/rc.conf I have gateway_enable="YES" and natd_enable="YES". For
> the firewalling, I recompiled the kernel wit
Hello,
What type of motherboard, processor, and speed are you using?
Are you overclocking?
Can you run healthd?
We recently had a series of problems, that appeared to be with or
related to scp. Since scp is somewhat processor intense, the
microprocessor was getting warm, no hot.. Hot en
Nick Rogness wrote:
On Fri, 5 Jan 2001, Sean wrote:
> Hello. I'm having some problems setting up a multihomed machine
and was
> wondering if someone could point me in the right direction.
I have a
> FreeBSD box with 2 ethernet cards. One card, rl0, is connected
to my
> cable modem. The othe
Hello..
Not seeing the entire thread, I am curious.. Do you have the same problem
with ftp?? Or is it scp that the problem shows up with??
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message
This has been committed.
People with unusual netgraph usage should contact me
for assistance if things fail.
In particular I would like to get some more pppoe users to try
it as I haven't convinced myself it's tested enough.
For the Netgraph-aware, the following changes have been made.
1/ data a
Nick Rogness wrote:
On Fri, 5 Jan 2001, Sean wrote:
> Hello. I'm having some problems setting up a multihomed machine
and was
> wondering if someone could point me in the right direction.
I have a
> FreeBSD box with 2 ethernet cards. One card, rl0, is connected
to my
> cable modem. The other
> Ahha.. Well.. Nice new word for the day "wonky" I like that :)
>
> Yea.. as I change things on the server, I can see the switch respond to my
>settings when it it is autoconfig mode. (worried abt that too :> )
>
> So then it *Could* be the motherboard.. I mean whats left, right?
It's very u
On 05-Jan-01 David Greenman wrote:
>> *SIGH*
>> Yup.. Well I tried setting the switch manually to: 100Mbps/Half/Enabled
>>(BackPressure) (It won't let me select no Flow control) ifconfiging to
>> 100BT/X it says media: 100baseTX status: active
>>
>>Same problem. Yes the switch is a Intel 460T
> *SIGH*
> Yup.. Well I tried setting the switch manually to: 100Mbps/Half/Enabled
>(BackPressure) (It won't let me select no Flow control) ifconfiging to
> 100BT/X it says media: 100baseTX status: active
>
>Same problem. Yes the switch is a Intel 460T. However the other servers are on
>the sa
On 05-Jan-01 ppX wrote:
> ifconfig fxp0 media 100baseTX mediaopt full-duplex
> is the correct way to set 100mbps fdx
>
> i've had similar problems and they where related to
> full-duplex/half-duplex settings...
>
*SIGH*
Yup.. Well I tried setting the switch manually to: 100Mbps/Half/Enabled
Hi, I seem to have a problem getting dummynet working on a filtering
bridge running 4.2-stable as on Dec 6
Problem: I am trying to limit the total outbound bandwith from a certain
machine. Prior to inserting the filtering bridge, it is directly
connected to a switch port which is connected to th
If
your freebsd machine is working fine and you can ping the windows box from
freebsd but not the other way, it seems to point to your firewall preventing the
windows box from connecting.
you
can disable the firewall completely and see if you can ping from the windows
machine, then work b
On Fri, Jan 05, 2001 at 11:30:12AM -0200, Marcus Vinícius Midena Ramos wrote:
> Try libnet (www.packetfactory.net/libnet). It is for injecting packets.
I've you've got plans to port your code to something other then BSD
you'll want to use libnet. Note that last time I looked, libnet didn't
suppo
On Fri, 5 Jan 2001, Sean wrote:
> Hello. I'm having some problems setting up a multihomed machine and was
> wondering if someone could point me in the right direction. I have a
> FreeBSD box with 2 ethernet cards. One card, rl0, is connected to my
> cable modem. The other card, rl1, is conne
< said:
> - It doesn't modify if_vlan.c anymore. Instead, it uses ifi_hdrlen to tell
> if_vlan.c that it supports long frames.
This looks good -- but I'm a bit confused by this segment of code:
+ #if NVLAN > 0
+ ifp->if_data.ifi_hdrlen = sizeof(struct ether_vlan_header);
+ #else
+ i
ifconfig fxp0 media 100baseTX mediaopt full-duplex
is the correct way to set 100mbps fdx
i've had similar problems and they where related to
full-duplex/half-duplex settings...
On Fri, 5 Jan 2001, Nicole wrote:
>
> On 05-Jan-01 Tom Samplonius wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, 4 Jan 2001, Nicole wrote:
Try libnet (www.packetfactory.net/libnet). It is for injecting packets.
Marcus.
Guido van Rooij wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 05, 2001 at 10:57:57AM +0100, Harti Brandt wrote:
> > On Fri, 5 Jan 2001, Guido van Rooij wrote:
> >
> > > I wonder if it is possible to send raw ethernet packets somehow in FreeB
Hello. I'm having some problems setting up a multihomed machine and
was wondering if someone could point me in the right direction. I
have a FreeBSD box with 2 ethernet cards. One card, rl0, is connected
to my cable modem. The other card, rl1, is connected to a Win2000
box. The goal is to h
Hello, all.
I've put in my web page (http://www.euitt.upm.es/~pjlobo/fbsdvlan.html) an
updated version of the patch to add vlan support to the fxp driver. This
patch differs from the previous releases in two major aspects:
- It doesn't modify if_vlan.c anymore. Instead, it uses ifi_hdrlen to tel
On Fri, 5 Jan 2001, Guido van Rooij wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 05, 2001 at 10:57:57AM +0100, Harti Brandt wrote:
> > On Fri, 5 Jan 2001, Guido van Rooij wrote:
> >
> > > I wonder if it is possible to send raw ethernet packets somehow in FreeBSD.
> > > E.g. using a AF_LINK, SOCK_RAW socket or something
On Fri, Jan 05, 2001 at 11:00:11AM +0100, Guido van Rooij wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 05, 2001 at 10:57:57AM +0100, Harti Brandt wrote:
> > On Fri, 5 Jan 2001, Guido van Rooij wrote:
> >
> > > I wonder if it is possible to send raw ethernet packets somehow in FreeBSD.
> > > E.g. using a AF_LINK, SOCK_RA
On Fri, Jan 05, 2001 at 10:57:57AM +0100, Harti Brandt wrote:
> On Fri, 5 Jan 2001, Guido van Rooij wrote:
>
> > I wonder if it is possible to send raw ethernet packets somehow in FreeBSD.
> > E.g. using a AF_LINK, SOCK_RAW socket or something.
>
> man 4 bpf
Eh..._send_, not receive.
-Guido
On Fri, 5 Jan 2001, Guido van Rooij wrote:
> I wonder if it is possible to send raw ethernet packets somehow in FreeBSD.
> E.g. using a AF_LINK, SOCK_RAW socket or something.
man 4 bpf
--
harti brandt, http://www.fokus.gmd.de/research/cc/cats/employees/hartmut.brandt/private
[EMA
yes and yes..it can be done. I think dhcp does it..
you can also do it very trivially by hooking a netgraph socket
directly to the netgraph hook on teh ehternet driver.
On Fri, 5 Jan 2001, Guido van Rooij wrote:
>
> I wonder if it is possible to send raw ethernet packets somehow in FreeBSD.
> E
I wonder if it is possible to send raw ethernet packets somehow in FreeBSD.
E.g. using a AF_LINK, SOCK_RAW socket or something.
-Guido
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message
On 05-Jan-01 Tom Samplonius wrote:
>
> On Thu, 4 Jan 2001, Nicole wrote:
>
> ...
>> The problem is that when trying to scp a file or send a large file to it
>> via
>> sendmail, (large = 253952 ) it seems to transmit along
>> happily, then (at least for scp) at abt 1/2 way through, it seems to
26 matches
Mail list logo
