Re: IPsec rekey question (bug in racoon?)

2001-10-03 Thread JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
> On Wed, 3 Oct 2001 22:57:01 +0200, > Guido van Rooij <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: >> Why would it? The two simplex channels of a IPsec "connection" really >> have very little to do with each other. > Why? Because if one system reboots, the key is gone so there is no way > to decrypt the

Re: IPsec rekey question (bug in racoon?)

2001-10-03 Thread Crist J. Clark
On Wed, Oct 03, 2001 at 10:57:01PM +0200, Guido van Rooij wrote: > On Wed, Oct 03, 2001 at 01:22:35PM -0700, Crist J. Clark wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 03, 2001 at 01:00:15PM +0200, Guido van Rooij wrote: > > > I am using Ipsec in tunnel mode. Everything works okay. Then I decide > > > to flush my SAD

Re: IPsec rekey question (bug in racoon?)

2001-10-03 Thread Guido van Rooij
On Wed, Oct 03, 2001 at 01:22:35PM -0700, Crist J. Clark wrote: > On Wed, Oct 03, 2001 at 01:00:15PM +0200, Guido van Rooij wrote: > > I am using Ipsec in tunnel mode. Everything works okay. Then I decide > > to flush my SAD entries, on _one_ side of the tunnel. > > Naturally, I see a key exchange

Re: IPsec rekey question (bug in racoon?)

2001-10-03 Thread Crist J. Clark
On Wed, Oct 03, 2001 at 01:00:15PM +0200, Guido van Rooij wrote: > I am using Ipsec in tunnel mode. Everything works okay. Then I decide > to flush my SAD entries, on _one_ side of the tunnel. > Naturally, I see a key exchange going on. > Afterwards I see that the system on which I flushed the SAD

test

2001-10-03 Thread Juan Fco Rodriguez Hervella
test -- * Juan F. Rodriguez Hervella Universidad Carlos III de Madrid To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message

Re: Questions...

2001-10-03 Thread JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
> On Fri, 28 Sep 2001 21:25:02 -0700, > "George V. Neville-Neil" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > 4) Will y'all continue to periodically integrate the Kame code as you v6 > solution? At least, we (the KAME project) are willing to continue the integrate effort. Whether or not the KAME code

Re: How to increase TCP and UDP buffers (for IPv4/IPv6)

2001-10-03 Thread Juan Fco Rodriguez Hervella
Hello: It does exist something like "ifconfig txqueuelen" in FreeBSD to change the transmit queue of a device ? note: Im not talking about "ipintrq", the IP input queue. I mean "transmit queue of device". Thanks! -- * Juan F. Rodriguez Hervella Universidad Carlo

IPsec rekey question (bug in racoon?)

2001-10-03 Thread Guido van Rooij
I am using Ipsec in tunnel mode. Everything works okay. Then I decide to flush my SAD entries, on _one_ side of the tunnel. Naturally, I see a key exchange going on. Afterwards I see that the system on which I flushed the SAD entries does have new ones. However the other side of the tunnel is stil

Re: How to increase TCP and UDP buffers (for IPv4/IPv6)

2001-10-03 Thread Luigi Rizzo
> Luigi Rizzo wrote: > > > > > Hi: > > > > > > It's possible to increase the TCP and UDP buffers ? > > > > > > I've had problems with UDP packets of 64 bytes discarded with a bandwith > > > of 2-3 Mbits, using a FreeBSD-4.3 router in a link of 10 Mbits. > > > > a router does not buffer through t

Re: Diagnostics question with PPPoE

2001-10-03 Thread Brian Somers
> Folks, > > I'm supporting a retail store setup where stores connect to the head office > using IPSec over PPPoE links, handled by a FreeBSD 4.3 server. Both IPSec > and PPPoE are working fine. However, lately we've been having problems > where PPP will disconnect for some reason and reconnect

Arp and two pccard NICs

2001-10-03 Thread Gavin Kenny
Hi, I have upgraded to 4.4 and I am trying to get my two pccard NICs to work at the same time. I've done some investigateing, but I'm not sure where to go next. both cards are the same make; Xircom 10/100 and both are detected and correctly configured upon insertion. I can assign IP addresses t