On Tue, 11 Jun 2002, Phil Dibowitz wrote:
> Glad it's fixed, and thanks for the info.
>
>
> Phil
Well, it's not fixed yet, but it will be. (Probably a week at least, I
don't have the time to devote to it right now, despite it being a simple
change.)
Mike "Silby" Silbersack
To Unsubscribe: s
In his (her ?) last exciting post,
with subject: Re: FreeBSD+Win2K+Wireless LAN,
"Jasper Wallace" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 12 Jun 2002, Kim Okasawa wrote:
> Also the win2k box will need ip forwarding enabled (routing). (i have no
> idea how to do that - i've only used win2k breifly).
Thanks for the info. I added the route to the FreeBSD box and it can now
ping the notebook computer but NOT vice versa (i.e. notebook cannot ping the
FBSD box.) Any idea what might be wrong? Thanks.
BTW, I did set the Win2K's 2nd NIC's gateway to 172.16.0.1. Sorry for the
typo.
Kim
In your config, are you negotiating anything related to VJ compression ?
Did you try increasing timeout values ?
- Original Message -
From: "Matthew Emmerton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Brian Somers" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 10:59 PM
Subject:
Hi,
anyone know of a netgraph node that implements decent-strength
encryption (Blowfish, etc.)?
Thanks,
Lars
--
Lars Eggert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> USC Information Sciences Institute
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Lars Eggert writes:
> anyone know of a netgraph node that implements decent-strength
> encryption (Blowfish, etc.)?
None that I know of...
ng_mppc(4) implements lame-strength encryption.
It would be easy to write one. The only complexity is dealing with
lost packets and synchronizing state.
-
Archie Cobbs wrote:
>>anyone know of a netgraph node that implements decent-strength
>>encryption (Blowfish, etc.)?
>
> None that I know of...
>
> ng_mppc(4) implements lame-strength encryption.
I looked briefly at ng_mppc but and was under the impression it needed a
ppp node above it. The pa
