On Sun, 7 Jul 2002, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
* Jonathan Lemon [EMAIL PROTECTED] [020707 21:48] wrote:
I do have a smaller TIME_WAIT structure done; it even throws the socket
away since it isn't needed. The savings are currently about 500 bytes,
and I can and also perform some other
Hi
I wondering what would be the best supported NIC
by FreeBSD 4.6 , I am in the process to upgrade
our mailhub and I would like to have freebsd-net
gurus advice on the best network hardware
Actually I use an Intel express PRO 10/100
and I experienced some lost connection
with the Postfix MTA
Sorry to cross post this, I want it in the archives.
[discussion on using mulitilink acrsss wireless cards deleted]
I have done similar, using two IP channels and with mpd as the
one2many
basically, assign real IP addresses to the 4 cards, on 2 separate
10.x.x.x/30 networks then open
On Mon, 8 Jul 2002, Mike Silbersack wrote:
On Sun, 7 Jul 2002, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
* Jonathan Lemon [EMAIL PROTECTED] [020707 21:48] wrote:
I do have a smaller TIME_WAIT structure done; it even throws the socket
away since it isn't needed. The savings are currently about 500
On Sun, 7 Jul 2002 01:37:10 -0700, Alfred Perlstein [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Some time ago I noticed that there appeared to be several members
of struct socket that were either only used by listen sockets or
only used by data sockets.
You can't do that. Self-connect is a valid operation on a
On Mon, Jul 08, 2002 at 11:56:22AM -0500, Mike Silbersack wrote:
...
Speaking of competition, someone should go look at this:
http://mail-index.netbsd.org/current-users/2002/07/03/0011.html
UDP sockets have the same problem... i posted patches for that
case around dec.2000 which i never
On Mon, Jul 08, 2002 at 10:16:36AM -0700, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
On Mon, Jul 08, 2002 at 11:56:22AM -0500, Mike Silbersack wrote:
...
Speaking of competition, someone should go look at this:
http://mail-index.netbsd.org/current-users/2002/07/03/0011.html
UDP sockets have the same
On Mon, Jul 08, 2002 at 01:22:14PM -0400, Bosko Milekic wrote:
...
Speaking of competition, someone should go look at this:
http://mail-index.netbsd.org/current-users/2002/07/03/0011.html
UDP sockets have the same problem... i posted patches for that
case around dec.2000 which i
On Mon, Jul 08, 2002 at 10:29:37AM -0700, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
On Mon, Jul 08, 2002 at 01:22:14PM -0400, Bosko Milekic wrote:
...
Speaking of competition, someone should go look at this:
http://mail-index.netbsd.org/current-users/2002/07/03/0011.html
UDP sockets have the same
On Mon, Jul 08, 2002 at 12:37:57PM -0500, Jonathan Lemon wrote:
On Mon, Jul 08, 2002 at 10:29:37AM -0700, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
On Mon, Jul 08, 2002 at 01:22:14PM -0400, Bosko Milekic wrote:
...
Speaking of competition, someone should go look at this:
if you can still find some, I was very happy with the DLINK DFE-570-TX
(4-port dc(4) NIC)
TfH
PS : the 3COM 3C905 NIC is also well supported under FreeBSD
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-net in the body of the message
unsubscribe freebsd-net
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-net in the body of the message
12 matches
Mail list logo
