Hello,
I have enabled AllowForeighAddress is proftpd.conf but still, people can't
fxp to my ftp site.
I think it has something to do with my IPFW rules. Here are the rules.
# allow loopback traffic
add 100 allow ip from any to any via lo0
# protect loopback address
add 200 deny ip from
- Original Message -
From: nascar24 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 18, 2002 12:00 PM
Subject: FXP behind firewall
Hello,
I have enabled AllowForeighAddress is proftpd.conf but still, people can't
fxp to my ftp site.
I think it has something to do
On 2002-07-18 03:37:46 -0700, Sulaiman Khan wrote:
Hello,
where can I download the complete API for BSD Sockets. I am currently working to
make an application compatiable with Berkeley sockets. So can you please guide me how
I can obtain the complete API
Thanks
Sulaiman Khan
Hi,
I'm sure this is a FAQ, but I sure can't find the answer. I've tried the
usually suggested gethostname()/gethostbyname() approach, but that only
returns the *first* match in /etc/hosts. In one case that was 127.0.0.1.
Clearly this was a case where /etc/host.conf gave priority to the host file.
On Thu, Jul 18, 2002 at 07:27:08AM -0700, Chuck T. wrote:
I'm sure this is a FAQ, but I sure can't find the answer. I've tried the
usually suggested gethostname()/gethostbyname() approach, but that only
returns the *first* match in /etc/hosts. In one case that was 127.0.0.1.
Clearly this
Thierry/all,
I do now notice that if I don't put a bpf filter inplace to cut out some of
the traffic there are a lot of dropped packets.
My question then is: Does FreeBSD multi-thread the NIC drivers? Right now,
using the dc driver.
From: Thierry Herbelot [[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent:
Erik Trulsson wrote:
On Thu, Jul 18, 2002 at 07:27:08AM -0700, Chuck T. wrote:
I'm sure this is a FAQ, but I sure can't find the answer. I've tried the
usually suggested gethostname()/gethostbyname() approach, but that only
returns the *first* match in /etc/hosts. In one case that was
Use gethostname()/gethostbyname() (or gethostbyaddr()) and then look
through the 'h_addr_list' array in the 'struct hostent' returned by
gethostbyname(). That should contain all the network addresses that
were found for the given host.
That doesn't work when the lookup matches an entry in
Excellent, that's just what I was looking for! Thanks.
do a man getifaddrs(3)
Bruce
_
Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: http://messenger.msn.com
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe
On Thu, Jul 18, 2002 at 09:52:14AM -0700, Chuck T. wrote:
Excellent, that's just what I was looking for! Thanks.
do a man getifaddrs(3)
Bruce
Just be aware that getifaddrs(3) (which does seem to be a quite useful
function) is not very portable.
It appears to be available on recent releases
I'm working on just such a driver. It has layers that communicate with
assumptions about structure alignment. Moving struct arpcom to the
beginning breaks this, and requires scattered changes throughout. :-(
Even so I'd rather do it the right way. Unless, I hear someone else
disagreeing,
Yes portablity is a concern, unfortunately my program will probably
be used on Linux more than FreeBSD, sigh. I starting to read about
ioctl() and SIOCGIFADDR which appears to be portable (and a pain).
It looks like the Linux crowd is adding getifaddrs(3) as part of their
ipv6 effort, but I'd
On Thu, 18 Jul 2002, Chuck T. wrote:
Yes portablity is a concern, unfortunately my program will
probably be used on Linux more than FreeBSD, sigh. I starting to
read about ioctl() and SIOCGIFADDR which appears to be portable
(and a pain).
We had to write portable local address detection
* De: Alex Rousskov [EMAIL PROTECTED] [ Data: 2002-07-18 ]
[ Subjecte: Re: programatically list all local IP addresses ? ]
On Thu, 18 Jul 2002, Chuck T. wrote:
Yes portablity is a concern, unfortunately my program will
probably be used on Linux more than FreeBSD, sigh. I starting
[Trying desparately to move this discussion to the correct list]
I spent a few minutes talking to Dave Clark about this question this
afternoon. Here's my paraphrase of his opinion:
- He disclaims completely up-to-date knowledge of the current research
results.
- He feels that 1000 ms is
and now that we are on -net...
TADA!!!
SACK is now supported by default on 90% of internet hosts except for
guess who?
SACK is the way that most internet traffic is now handling packet loss.
Isn't it about time that one of the (3?) SACK implementations got
integrated?
On Thu, 18 Jul 2002,
When I attempt to make a sock_stream connection to an IP, and DON'T
receive an ACK or RST response, it seems that the system retries a finite
number of times by sending additional SYN packets. There also looks to be
a 3 or 6 second delay between SYN retries. After four or five, the
connection
On Thu, Jul 18, 2002 at 02:39:26PM -0700, Julian Elischer wrote:
and now that we are on -net...
TADA!!!
SACK is now supported by default on 90% of internet hosts except for
guess who?
supported does not mean used though, and I am not even sure how much
traffic is successfully delivered
In article local.mail.freebsd-net/[EMAIL PROTECTED] you
write:
When I attempt to make a sock_stream connection to an IP, and DON'T
receive an ACK or RST response, it seems that the system retries a finite
number of times by sending additional SYN packets. There also looks to be
a 3 or 6 second
On Thu, 18 Jul 2002 19:18:33 +0200,
Erik Trulsson [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Excellent, that's just what I was looking for! Thanks.
do a man getifaddrs(3)
Just be aware that getifaddrs(3) (which does seem to be a quite useful
function) is not very portable.
It appears to be available on
I'm using FreeBSD 4.5 and have custom applications that send receive
network packets over both tcp and udp sockets. For the sake of an
example, assume that the udp traffic is always constant, but the tcp
traffic density changes. During times of heavy tcp traffic density, will
udp messages
TCP traffic as such does not get any priority over UDP traffic, but the way
in which the TCP messages are sent (Data Streaming) is different from the
way UDP messages are sent (Datagram).
In essense, UDP messages wait till there's enough space for the entire
message before the message is added
Hi,
Would like to know how to test VLAN for ethernet
network driver for a NIC.
Thanks a lot
shubha
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Autos - Get free new car price quotes
http://autos.yahoo.com
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with
23 matches
Mail list logo
