Re: ping6 ::1 - No route to host

On Sat, 16 Nov 2002 21:37:50 +0100 Ronald van der Pol [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Check firewalling. I think IPv6 ipfilter is blocking by default. rvdp To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-net in the body of the message I have rules to allow

Re: if_ef doesn't work with if_fxp?

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote, On 11/14/02 15:26: I checked with our network/netware guy, and he's told me that we're running 0 interface with an Ethernet_II frame, so I've got fxp0f0 configured with our network number, which he's given me as 0x83a2c800 Yust for fun - 0x83a2c800=131.162.200.0,

Netgraph support with the Sangoma's boards

According to Google, there is not support of Netgraph with the Sangoma's boards. In fact, I am wondering if I could use the Sangoma's boards like the if_sr and if_ar drivers that have a nice Netgraph hook. Vincent To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-net in

Re: ping6 ::1 - No route to host

On Sun, 17 Nov 2002 14:40:22 +0100 Ronald van der Pol [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sun, Nov 17, 2002 at 03:17:02 -0600, drogoh wrote: I have rules to allow protocol 41 in and out, what else should I have? I had a similar problem when I upgraded to -current. All IPv6 packets were blocked

Arp and Route Commands

Hello, I'm new to the list and was hoping maybe someone could help me. These commands work in Linux (and in this order), but not in FreeBSD/Mac OS X as the arp and route commands are different: arp -s 10.10.10.0 00:00:ca:13:4b:54 -i eth1 arp -s 10.10.10.0 00:00:ca:13:4b:54 -i eth1 route add

Re: Arp and Route Commands

Karl, try man arp man route on your FreeBSD system. Martin Karl Timmermann wrote: Hello, I'm new to the list and was hoping maybe someone could help me. These commands work in Linux (and in this order), but not in FreeBSD/Mac OS X as the arp and route commands are different: arp -s

Re: Arp and Route Commands [sorry]

Sorry, I should have tried this out before sending the other email. Your new route comand works, but the arp command says: set: can only proxy for 10.10.10.0 Any ideas? Thanks again, Karl set: can only proxy for 10.10.10.0 On Sunday, November 17, 2002, at 04:59 PM, Martin J. Muench wrote:

Re: Arp and Route Commands

Hi, I tried that, but I'm just a dumb high school kid who even after reading it, didn't understand the syntax, nor how to make it work. Sorry Karl On Sunday, November 17, 2002, at 04:58 PM, Martin Stiemerling wrote: Karl, try man arp man route on your FreeBSD system. Martin Karl

Re: Arp and Route Commands

Hi, I tried that, but I'm just a dumb high school kid who even after reading it, didn't understand the syntax, nor how to make it work. This is like translations between human languages - hard in common case but possible every patucular case. What is yours circumstances? Sorry Karl

Re: Qs about snoop TCP

soheil soheil wrote: Dear All I want to know what is Snoop TCP , and Is it implemented on FreeBSD or Not ? Snoop TCP is a mechansim for performing impedence matching between a network with very little loss attached at the border of a network with much more loss. It operates as a

RE: Qs about snoop TCP

Hi Maybe the attached is what you want. Br. ChunAn Li -Original Message- From: ext soheil soheil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Sunday, November 17, 2002 10:54 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Qs about snoop TCP Dear All I want to know what is Snoop TCP , and Is it implemented

Re: Arp and Route Commands

Hi! If you need route throw router with MAC 00:00:ca:13:4b:54 do like this: route add -net 10.10.10.0 -interface eth1 route add default 10.10.10.1 If the network 10.10.10.0 routing by your FreeBSD box: you must add route on the central router to network 10.10.10.0 throw your FreeBSD. For Cisco