Re: OpenNMS requiring JDK 1.4

2003-01-05 Thread Michael DeMan
Hi, Yes, you need JDK 1.4, a friend of mine was porting it to MacOSX and the whole thing broke when OpenNMS release a 1.4 dependent version. In theory, you should be able to run it in linux-compatibility mode on FreeBSD with a recent JDK. We have played with it on a RedHat 7.3 box, and looked in

help-urgent

2003-01-05 Thread shubha mr
Hi, If I have to write to a register at offset say x,in the pci configuration space,how do I do it? If it is using pci_read_config and pci_write_config,how does the system know where the pci reg base address of my device is? plese help urgent shubha __

Re: Need help dealing with (D)DoS attacks (desperately) - MORE INFO

2003-01-05 Thread .
> > Ok, I am now armed with quite a bit more info regarding these attacks. > > First off, the target looks like this: > > Port State Service > 21/tcp openftp > 22/tcp openssh > 25/tcp opensmtp > 53/tcp opendomain > 80/tcp open

Re: default route

2003-01-05 Thread .
[ Charset ISO-8859-1 unsupported, converting... ] > According to your ifconfig, I believe you have essentially assigned the same > networks to both interfaces (128.111.147.250 netmask 0x falls within > the larger 128.111.147.251/24). In which case, there is no way to > distinguish between

Re: Need help dealing with (D)DoS attacks (desperately)

2003-01-05 Thread .
> > Hello, > > Ok, right now this second, everything is normal, I am not under attack > AFAIK, and everything is working wonderfully - and when I run top I see: > > 21 processes: 1 running, 20 sleeping > CPU states: 0.0% user, 0.0% nice, 0.0% system, 41.7% interrupt, 58.3% > idle > Mem: 6812

Re: default route

2003-01-05 Thread Eric W. Bates
According to your ifconfig, I believe you have essentially assigned the same networks to both interfaces (128.111.147.250 netmask 0x falls within the larger 128.111.147.251/24). In which case, there is no way to distinguish between the two interfaces because your default IP, 128.111.147.25

Re: Need help dealing with (D)DoS attacks (desperately)

2003-01-05 Thread Josh Brooks
Alternatively, is getting a much faster CPU (p3 1.6g ?) a "big hammer" that solves problems related to the number of rules being parsed for each packet ? Just curious. On Sun, 5 Jan 2003, Barney Wolff wrote: > On Sun, Jan 05, 2003 at 01:31:24PM -0800, Josh Brooks wrote: > > So, I have 927 ipfw

Re: Need help dealing with (D)DoS attacks (desperately)

2003-01-05 Thread Barney Wolff
On Sun, Jan 05, 2003 at 01:31:24PM -0800, Josh Brooks wrote: > So, I have 927 ipfw tules in place - but I am guessing that about 800 of > those rules are just "count" rules for me to count bandwidth: > > 001 164994 120444282 count ip from any to 10.10.10.10 > 002 158400 16937232 count ip from 10.1

Re: Need help dealing with (D)DoS attacks (desperately) - MORE INFO

2003-01-05 Thread Josh Brooks
Ok, I am now armed with quite a bit more info regarding these attacks. First off, the target looks like this: Port State Service 21/tcp openftp 22/tcp openssh 25/tcp opensmtp 53/tcp opendomain 80/tcp openhttp 110/tcpopen

Re: default route

2003-01-05 Thread randall ehren
> > how can i assign the default gateway to use fxp0 instead? > > route delete default > route add default A.B.C.D i read the man page, it indicated the use of the -inteface flag but i could not get it to work. doing what you say did not fix the problem either: as you described: root@fw-1[~]%

Re: Need help dealing with (D)DoS attacks (desperately)

2003-01-05 Thread Josh Brooks
Hello, Ok, right now this second, everything is normal, I am not under attack AFAIK, and everything is working wonderfully - and when I run top I see: 21 processes: 1 running, 20 sleeping CPU states: 0.0% user, 0.0% nice, 0.0% system, 41.7% interrupt, 58.3% idle Mem: 6812K Active, 43M Inact,

Re: default route

2003-01-05 Thread Lars Eggert
On 1/5/2003 1:26 PM, randall ehren wrote: how can i assign the default gateway to use fxp0 instead? route delete default route add default A.B.C.D As described in the man page. Lars -- Lars Eggert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> USC Information Sciences Institute smime.p7s Description: S/MI

default route

2003-01-05 Thread randall ehren
hi, i have a freebsd box acting as a firewall using ipfilter over a bridge. the machine has two interfaces: fxp0 = connected to outside world interface rl0 = connected to internal subnet when i add the default gateway, it defaults to assigning it to rl0. from netstat -rn: Destination

Re: Need help dealing with (D)DoS attacks (desperately)

2003-01-05 Thread Lars Eggert
On 1/5/2003 1:05 PM, Josh Brooks wrote: I am running this as my firewall/router: 4.4-RELEASE FreeBSD 4.4-RELEASE #0 And I have no ability to change that anytime soon. Recently I have been having a lot of trouble with floods/ddos/etc. When these attacks occur, my firewall is totally unresponsi

Need help dealing with (D)DoS attacks (desperately)

2003-01-05 Thread Josh Brooks
Hi. I am running this as my firewall/router: 4.4-RELEASE FreeBSD 4.4-RELEASE #0 And I have no ability to change that anytime soon. Recently I have been having a lot of trouble with floods/ddos/etc. When these attacks occur, my firewall is totally unresponsive, I cannot ssh in to type a single

OpenNMS requiring JDK 1.4

2003-01-05 Thread Will Williams
Hi, I am sending this to Java and Net lists in hopes of someone having some info on OpenNMS. I would like to install but, OpenNMS requires JDK 1.4, which doesn't appear to be fully supported by FreeBSD yet. Is this correct? Does anyone else have any success stories or horror stories on FreeB

raw socket/icmp-echo

2003-01-05 Thread Abdul Basit
Hello, I was trying to learn raw sockets, I wrote a simple program to get all icmp packets and display .. -- program int main(void) { int sockfd; int ip_len; char*buf; int n; struct icmp*icmp; s

test

2003-01-05 Thread Abdul Basit
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message