In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Nate Lawson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
: I was looking into some "could sleep messages" and found some bogus
: locking in the attach routine of many drivers. Several init a mtx in
: their softc and then lock/unlock it in their attach routine. This, of
On 1/6/2003 8:26 PM, shubha mr wrote:
very surprisingly my ethernet gigabit NIC's
performance (in MBPS) is more in single processor
machine than in a dual processor machine.The tool used
to measure the thruput was chariot.Is this due to
cache issues? Any ideas to resolve this strange
problem?
Y
Hi,
very surprisingly my ethernet gigabit NIC's
performance (in MBPS) is more in single processor
machine than in a dual processor machine.The tool used
to measure the thruput was chariot.Is this due to
cache issues? Any ideas to resolve this strange
problem?
Thanks in advance,
shubha
__
On Mon, Jan 06, 2003 at 06:42:26PM -0800, Lev Walkin wrote:
> Consider using libpcap - this is the portable library that uses
> bpf, raw socket, packet socket or whatever packets source is available
> for the particular platform.
>
> Pcap tutorial available here:
> http://reactor-core.org/securit
Abdul Basit wrote:
Hello,
I was trying to learn raw sockets, I wrote a simple program
to get all icmp packets and display ..
-- program
int
main(void)
{
int sockfd;
int ip_len;
char*buf;
int n;
struct icmp
Is there any reason to fix the code in the kernel which assumes
rt_mask(rt) is a properly-formed sockaddr?
For example, sys/net/rtsock.c:sysctl_dumpentry() just passes
rt_mask(rt)'s contents to userland to be interpretted as a sockaddr but it
seldomly is a properly-formed sockaddr (i.e. sa_fa
On Mon, 6 Jan 2003, Kyunghwan Kim wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 06, 2003 at 10:58:25AM +0100, Harti Brandt wrote:
> > On Fri, 3 Jan 2003, Nate Lawson wrote:
> > NL>I was looking into some "could sleep messages" and found some bogus
> > NL>locking in the attach routine of many drivers. Several init a mtx in
On Mon, Jan 06, 2003 at 10:58:25AM +0100, Harti Brandt wrote:
> On Fri, 3 Jan 2003, Nate Lawson wrote:
> NL>I was looking into some "could sleep messages" and found some bogus
> NL>locking in the attach routine of many drivers. Several init a mtx in
> NL>their softc and then lock/unlock it in thei
On Fri, 3 Jan 2003, Nate Lawson wrote:
NL>I was looking into some "could sleep messages" and found some bogus
NL>locking in the attach routine of many drivers. Several init a mtx in
NL>their softc and then lock/unlock it in their attach routine. This, of
NL>course, does nothing to provide exclus
Don't think these lists are the best place for this question but alas...
On Mon, Jan 06, 2003 at 06:25:13AM +, shubha mr wrote:
> If I have to write to a register at offset say x,in
> the pci configuration space,how do I do it? If it is
> using pci_read_config and pci_write_config,how does
>
10 matches
Mail list logo
