Re: Sorry if duplicate...Multicast Routing

2003-06-17 Thread Robert Watson
On Tue, 17 Jun 2003, Tom Daly wrote: Has anyone been able to create a unified multicast broadcast domain using FreeBSD routers and tunnels? Our internal telephone system VOIP system that uses multicast to handle things like conference calling and paging. Many of our employess are off site,

Re: Sorry if duplicate...Multicast Routing

2003-06-17 Thread Tom Daly
Robert, Could you clarify a bit? Are you able to move the multicast traffic between each side of the IP-IP tunnel? Tom On Tue, 17 Jun 2003, Robert Watson wrote: On Tue, 17 Jun 2003, Tom Daly wrote: Has anyone been able to create a unified multicast broadcast domain using FreeBSD routers

Re: Sorry if duplicate...Multicast Routing

2003-06-17 Thread Robert Watson
On Tue, 17 Jun 2003, Tom Daly wrote: Could you clarify a bit? Are you able to move the multicast traffic between each side of the IP-IP tunnel? Yes. We use mrouted to configure multicast tunnels in pretty much the following way (IP addresses tweaked to protect the guilty): % more

IPv6 and me....

2003-06-17 Thread agent dero
I am starting a hosting company in southern texas using a couple of dual Pentium servers I got from a friend, and I using FreeBSD to run the whole sha- bang. I am also planning on using IPv6, mainly because of it's advantages, and I think the internet should start moving over to IPv6. The big

Re: Sorry if duplicate...Multicast Routing

2003-06-17 Thread Tom Daly
Robert, I think our situation is a bit more complicated, however, I'll draw it out to hopefully add some direction. ## ### Office VOIP PBX### Routable IP Address Office Net ##

Re: IPv6 and me....

2003-06-17 Thread Barney Wolff
On Tue, Jun 17, 2003 at 05:42:56PM -0400, Robert Watson wrote: This isn't the answer you're looking for, but... I was very interested to see a CNET article that DoD has announced a concrete interest in deploying IPv6 over the next five years. If that is indeed the case, you're going to see

Re: IPv6 and me....

2003-06-17 Thread Alex Soares de Moura
It seems that the most of the commercial deployment of IPv6 has been mostly done in Asia. NTT/Verio has a Tier1 backbone in production. Nanog has a FAQ entry about the subject: http://www.nanog.org/listfaq.html Maybe in the list of sites by contry you'll find something useful:

replacement for SOCK_PACKET

2003-06-17 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi all, What is the BSD equivalent of this Linux call: sock=socket(AF_INET,SOCK_PACKET,htons(ETH_P_RARP)); Thanks, -ansh mail2web - Check your email from the web at http://mail2web.com/ .

replacement for SOCK_PACKET

2003-06-17 Thread Garrett Wollman
On Tue, 17 Jun 2003 20:35:23 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: What is the BSD equivalent of this Linux call: sock=socket(AF_INET,SOCK_PACKET,htons(ETH_P_RARP)); man libpcap -GAWollman ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list

Re: Multicast Routing

2003-06-17 Thread Bill Fenner
Tom, Currently, we use a PPP tunnel to put the PBX and Phone on subnets that can talk to each other. The two FBSD boxen run as the endpoints of the tunnel. We need to be able to seamlessly forward multicast traffic between the remote network and the office network. Any ideas? mrouted should

RE: replacement for SOCK_PACKET

2003-06-17 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thanks Garrett. I am trying to write a small program to send out gratituous arps (because the em driver does not work) for a redundancy (via IP address take over) scheme. I do NOT want to use libpcap or libnet as these will not be available on prodution servers. I could probably statically link

RE: replacement for SOCK_PACKET

2003-06-17 Thread Robert Watson
On Tue, 17 Jun 2003, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I am trying to write a small program to send out gratituous arps (because the em driver does not work) for a redundancy (via IP address take over) scheme. Hmm. If you're having if_em bugs and haven't already submitted a PR, please do so. Our

Enhancements for racoon

2003-06-17 Thread Ari Suutari
Hi, I have developed two enhancements for racoon. First one is simple support for 'keepalive' statement in racoon configuration file, which causes racoon to keep link up with remote end even when there is no traffic. It also does this when racoon is started, which is very nice since it also