Hi!
> FreeBSD lacks features deployed in the market, when acting as a VPN
> endpoint, as well as when acting as a NAT device in the VPN packet flow.
> Either is a pity, unfortunately.
>
> I am not complaining; I am just stating that we're behind. But FreeS/WAN
> is in no better shape.
Who would
Crist J. Clark:
>On Sat, Nov 15, 2003 at 07:54:40AM +0100, Oldach, Helge wrote:
>> From: Crist J. Clark [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> > Two different ESP end points behind many-to-one NAT connected to
>> > a single ESP end point on the other side of the NAT? I'd be very
>> > curious to get the docum
www.websehri.com
Websehri.com Acildi
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
