> "Andre" == Andre Oppermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Andre> There are two possible ways this can happen: The function
Andre> m_copym was called with off == 0, or off == m->m_len. Neither
Andre> is supposed to happen (obviously) so the bug must be in
Andre> ip_fragment. Lets have a look a
On Sunday 11 January 2004 01:34, Kevin Oberman wrote:
>
> Marko,
>
> I just started re-building my kernel with this patch. I have
> previously reported this under CURRENT and hope that this might fix
> the problem. It has also been reported by several others under
> slightly different circumstances
> From: Marko Zec <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2004 15:11:04 +0100
> Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
> --Boundary-00=_4fAAAunGWPP68/U
> Content-Type: text/plain;
> charset="iso-8859-2"
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
> Content-Disposition: inline
>
> Hi Lorenzo,
>
> can you try the
Andre Oppermann wrote:
>
> David Gilbert wrote:
> >
> > I just updated a machine that uses GRE to -CURRENT. Upon rebooting,
> > the debugger stopped at the following:
> >
> > "panic: m_copym, offset > size of mbuf chain"
>
> There are two possible ways this can happen: The function m_copym
> wa
Andre Oppermann wrote:
>
> David Gilbert wrote:
> >
> > I just updated a machine that uses GRE to -CURRENT. Upon rebooting,
> > the debugger stopped at the following:
> >
> > "panic: m_copym, offset > size of mbuf chain"
>
> There are two possible ways this can happen: The function m_copym
> wa
David Gilbert wrote:
>
> I just updated a machine that uses GRE to -CURRENT. Upon rebooting,
> the debugger stopped at the following:
>
> "panic: m_copym, offset > size of mbuf chain"
There are two possible ways this can happen: The function m_copym
was called with off == 0, or off == m->m_len
> I have 3 Nics lets name them NIC1-NIC2-NIC3
> NIC1 --> Internal Network /24
> NIC2 --> OutSide World (A)
> NIC2 --> OutSide World (B)
I have a similar situation (I think). I also have two seperate
connections to the internet.
fxp0: 11.22.33.44 gateway 11.22.33.1
fxp1: 66.77.88.99 gateway 66.77.88
I just updated a machine that uses GRE to -CURRENT. Upon rebooting,
the debugger stopped at the following:
"panic: m_copym, offset > size of mbuf chain"
panic()
m_copym()
ip_fragment()
ip_output()
gre_output()
ip_output()
udp_output()
upd_send()
sosend()
kern_sendit()
sendit()
sendto()
syscall()
Hey,
Apparently the WRT54G is having some arp issues. I'd check the following:
- install latest firmware
- install Ethereal on the windows machine and watch the traffic exchange
when you would ping/access the WRT54G. It is important that this is done
right after boot so that the Windows machin
oops, mistype, that should've been 4.9-stable instead of 4.0...
stupidfingers...
Hello:
I'm having problems getting a FreeBSD machine and a Linksys
WRT54G talking with each other.
Interfaces:
dc0 - "public" to outside Internet
dc1 - internal 192.168.0.1/24, connects to a hub
dc2 - internal 192.1
>Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2004 12:56:20 -0500 (EST)
>From: Anthony Volodkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: Kenneth W Cochran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: Re: (revised) 4.0-stable & Linksys WRT54G won't talk w/each other
>
>Hey,
>
>Apparently the WRT54G is having some
Hello:
I'm having problems getting a FreeBSD machine and a Linksys
WRT54G talking with each other.
Interfaces:
dc0 - "public" to outside Internet
dc1 - internal 192.168.0.1/24, connects to a hub
dc2 - internal 192.168.1.100/24, connects to a switched LAN port on the router
dc3 - currently unused
Hi Lorenzo,
can you try the attached patch, it does seem to help on my ThinkPad X30,
which has an internal mini-PCI Prism2.5 card with the same firmware.
Cheers,
Marko
On Saturday 10 January 2004 03:43, Lorenzo Vicisano wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This is the context:
>
> - Stable as of Jan 9 (FreeBSD
> On Sat, 10 Jan 2004 00:48:26 +0300 (MSK)
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Does
> > ifconfig xx down; ifconfig xx up
> > helps?
> Tried that many many times; no effect.
>
> > Can be packet loss triggered by a lot of small
> > packets on this interface?
> Not that I've noticed. Any suggestions on h
14 matches
Mail list logo
