AL Chane:
Hi, there:
I have two interfaces on my linux PC in the same network:
ifconfig eth0 172.20.1.30 netmask 255.255.255.0
ifconfig eth1 172.20.1.31 netmask 255.255.255.0
Another Windows PC with IP 172.20.1.32 netmask 255.255.255.0
I found that in the same network, Linux PC
AL Chane wrote:
AL Chane:
Hi, there:
I have two interfaces on my linux PC in the same network:
ifconfig eth0 172.20.1.30 netmask 255.255.255.0
ifconfig eth1 172.20.1.31 netmask 255.255.255.0
Another Windows PC with IP 172.20.1.32 netmask 255.255.255.0
I found that in the same network,
Hi all,
Can anyone direct me to a good tutorial on ipf / ipnat? Specifically I need to
open a contiguous range of ports with ipf then forward them (rdr?) to an
internal IP address with ipnat.
Thanks for all replies
This
[...]
We're using Netramet and Nemac to get data from the flows. If the mirror
iface has an ip address, Nemac cannot poll (or whatever it's called it
does) data from Netramet and the bge0 card and saying something like no
response from x.x.x.3 (it's the fxp0 card). (It's kinda strange,
Sometime between Feb 9 and June 9 something changed in the kernel
that causes racoon to fail. I'm afraid I don't have a verbatim
error message handy, but my notes (from running racoon with debugging
enabled, in the foreground) say the error was in pk_sendupdate
and the errno was, ENOBUFS.
I
This commit reminded me one of my old ideas. Why not to make some
function that allow to change DLT on the fly?
Such as NetBSD's bpf_change_type()?
/*
* Change the data link type of a interface.
*/
void
bpf_change_type(ifp, dlt, hdrlen)
struct ifnet *ifp;
u_int dlt, hdrlen;
{
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
On Wed, Jun 09, 2004 at 02:23:31PM -0600, Mike Durian wrote:
Sometime between Feb 9 and June 9 something changed in the kernel
that causes racoon to fail.
It happened between May 30 and June 4.
I'm afraid I don't have a verbatim
error
On 2004-06-09 11:20, Danny Horne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can anyone direct me to a good tutorial on ipf / ipnat? Specifically
I need to open a contiguous range of ports with ipf then forward
them (rdr?) to an internal IP address with ipnat.
The first is easy to set up if you look at the
Julian Elischer wrote:
If you don't know or care about netgraph metadata (e.g. packet priority)
then this shouldn't worry you.
We are changing the netgraph metadata facility (in which arbitrary
metadata can be sent with a packet through processing) to use
the mbuf TAG facility that has been