On Wed, 25 Aug 2004, 06:06+0200, Oldach, Helge wrote:
So please go ahead, give Marko that bit and let him commit this decent work!
Please don't touch RELENG_4.
Helge
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Julian Elischer
Sent:
On Tue, Aug 24, 2004 at 01:55:08PM +0300, Pavel Gulchouck writes:
PG On Tue, Aug 24, 2004 at 12:29:23PM +0200, Andre Oppermann writes:
I have hangs tcp-sessions in the FIN_WAIT_2 state, in which packets
sends to remote for several days. Sockstate tells none aboute its,
restart httpd has no
On Wednesday 25 August 2004 00:15, Julian Elischer wrote:
You do know don't you, that if you continue to do these things, you will
be punnished by
getting a CVS commit bit..?
Well, I didn't write the code myself, just ported it from -CURRENT. Anyhow,
glad to see that people still care about
Hi,
I first came across this a couple of months ago, but today I finally
took the time to look into it.
Basically, if a program has recently closed a TCP connection or three
and they are currently in CLOSED or TIME_WAIT state, sockstat(1) will
report them as active connected sockets and link
Peter Pentchev wrote:
Hi,
I first came across this a couple of months ago, but today I finally
took the time to look into it.
Basically, if a program has recently closed a TCP connection or three
and they are currently in CLOSED or TIME_WAIT state, sockstat(1) will
report them as
On Wed, Aug 25, 2004 at 05:48:38PM +0200, Andre Oppermann wrote:
Peter Pentchev wrote:
[snip]
Luckily, the fix is simple, or at least so it seems to me. It turns out
that those connections have a xt_socket-xso_so set to NULL, and the
false positive comes from sockstat's matching them to a
Peter Pentchev wrote:
On Wed, Aug 25, 2004 at 05:48:38PM +0200, Andre Oppermann wrote:
Peter Pentchev wrote:
[snip]
Luckily, the fix is simple, or at least so it seems to me. It turns out
that those connections have a xt_socket-xso_so set to NULL, and the
false positive comes from
Hi,
I configured a tunnel between two FreeBSD machines with IPSEC,
for just using the IPCOMP (without ESP and AH), but the
performance wasn't good.
Has someone configured a tunnel for only compressing data?
Sorry for the bad english!
Thiago
___
On August 25, 2004 06:44 am, Marko Zec wrote:
On Wednesday 25 August 2004 00:15, Julian Elischer wrote:
You do know don't you, that if you continue to do these things, you will
be punnished by
getting a CVS commit bit..?
Well, I didn't write the code myself, just ported it from -CURRENT.
In reply to Darcy Buskermolen [EMAIL PROTECTED] :
On August 25, 2004 06:44 am, Marko Zec wrote:
On Wednesday 25 August 2004 00:15, Julian Elischer wrote:
You do know don't you, that if you continue to do these things, you will
be punnished by
getting a CVS commit bit..?
Well, I
Eli Dart wrote:
Careful there.one major reason I use FreeBSD is that, compared
with the other operating systems I can use, major breakages are rare.
I expect the policy that prevents you from deploying the most
featureful OS available is there to avoid the late-night pain
required to run
Jon Noack wrote:
Eli Dart wrote:
Careful there.one major reason I use FreeBSD is that, compared
with the other operating systems I can use, major breakages are rare.
I expect the policy that prevents you from deploying the most
featureful OS available is there to avoid the late-night pain
Dear List
I have one simple question regarding pf.
Does pf load balancing outgoing internet conenction from LAN rules can
work together with pf redirection rules are used to forward incoming
connections from the Internet to a local server with a private address ?
Please enlight me
regards
Reza
13 matches
Mail list logo
